Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma

Delhi High Court · 15 Mar 2023 · 2023:DHC:1949
Prathiba M. Singh
FAO 36/2021
2023:DHC:1949
administrative appeal_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court upheld the fixed tehbazari fees for Kalkaji Mandir shops, cancelled allotments of non-compliant allottees, ordered eviction of unauthorized occupants, and directed public auction of shops to ensure orderly management and redevelopment of the Mandir premises.

Full Text
Translation output
2023:DHC:1949
FAO 36/2021 & connected matters
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 15th March, 2023
FAO 36/2021 & CM APPLs.2914/2021, 10442/2021, 10444/2021, 20904/2021, 23819/2021, 25868/2021, 25869/2021, 25870/2021, 25884/2021, 25885/2021, 26495/2021, 29121/2021, 38063/2021, 38289/2021, 39643/2021, 43944-46/2021, 3172/2022, 3455/2022, 5641/2022, 5642/2022, 5803/2022, 5865/2022, 7745/2022, 13472/2022, 16153/2022, 17039/2022, 18207/2022, 18247/2022, 18248/2022, 21768/2022, 21801/2022, 21802/2022, 21803/2022, 22125/2022, 23093/2022, 29624/2022, 32296/2022, 34552/2022, 34553/2022, 39754-
55/2022, 40548/2022, 43723/2022, 53179/2022, 876/2023
NEETA BHARDWAJ & ORS. ..... Appellants
VERSUS
KAMLESH SHARMA ..... Respondent
WITH
CM (M) 323/2021 & CM APPL. 14178/2021, 20945/2021, 20949/2021, 40269/2021
CONT.CAS(C) 614/2021
RFA 413/2021
CS (OS) 2499/2010
CS (OS) 511/2021
CS (OS) 526/2021 & I.A. 7511/2022
CS (OS) 527/2021 & I.As.1717-18/2022
CS (OS) 533/2021 & I.As.1721-22/2022
CS (OS) 535/2021 & I.A. 7552/2022
CS (OS) 538/2021 & I.As.1725-26/2022
CS (OS) 539/2021 & I.As. 9063/2022, 9064/2022
CS (OS) 540/2021 & I.A. 7940/2022
CS (OS) 541/2021 & I.As.1723-24/2022
CS (OS) 542/2021 & I.As. 9031/2022, 9032/2022
CS (OS) 544/2021 & I.As.1719-20/2022
CS (OS) 545/2021
CS (OS) 547/2021 & I.As.1715-16/2022
CS (OS) 554/2021 & I.As. 9061/2022, 9062/2022
CS (OS) 579/2021 & I.As. 9981/2022, 9982/2022
CS (OS) 55/2022, I.As.12299/2022, 12300/2022, 12341-42/2022, 19288/2022
Appearances:- Mr. Arun Birbal, Mr. Sanjay Singh & Ms. Sonia Singhania, Advocates for
DDA. (M:9958118327)
Mr. Neeraj Bhardwaj & Mr. Rahul Bhardwaj, Advocates.
Mr. Lokesh Bhardwaj, Advocate. (M:9971576388)
Mr. Kush Bhardwaj, Advocate. (M:9891074686)
Ms. Samapika Biswal and Mr. Aman Kumar Yadav, Advocates for Ld.
Administrator. (M:9406951592)
Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Amicus Mr. Luv Bhardwaj, Advocate (M-9990693140)
Mr. Siddharth Panda and Mr. Ritank, Advs. for SDMC. (M:9891488088)
Mr. Thakur Sumit, Advocate.
Mr. Vishal Bhardwaj, Advocate Mr. Ishkaran Singh, Advocate for 19 shopkeepers. (M:9582021885)
Mr. Paul Kumar Kalai and Mr. Kaoliangpov Kamei, Advs for Petitioner.
(M:8376813694).
Mr Prabhas Chandra, Advocate.
Mr. R.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate (M: 9312710457).
Mr. Rajmangal Kumar (M: 9871211544).
Mr. Goonmeet Singh, Architect.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar, SHO.
Mr.Rajeev Kumar Chauhan, Advocate for Unregistered Vendors.
Ms. Himanshi Kaushik, Architect.
Mr. S. Sasibhushan, Advocate.
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
JUDGMENT

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. These matters pertain to the Kalkaji Mandir, which this Court has been hearing from time to time. These are part-heard matters. Demarcation of Mandir Premises

3. On 22nd February, 2023, the Court was informed during the hearing by the SDM- Kalkaji’s Office that a tender was floated for carrying out demarcation through a TSM agency for the survey of the premises and the same was to be finalised shortly. In view of the said submission, the Court had directed the SDM’s Office to place a report in respect of the demarcation on record by the next date of hearing.

4. None has appeared on behalf of the SDM-Kalkaji today and no report in relation to demarcation has been filed.

5. Mr. J.B. Kapil, SDM-Kalkaji shall be personally present in Court on the next date of hearing and update the Court on the demarcation process as the Court has been informed by ld. Counsel for the Administrator, that there has been no further progress as the tender did not yield any response.

6. SDM-Kalkaji shall also collect from ld. Counsel for the parties, as also any other parties, the details of the demarcation done in 2012 by M/s Dhyani Constructions and make his submissions before the Court in respect of demarcation of the mandir premises on the next date of hearing.

7. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Inspector, who has joined the hearing virtually, has been informed of this order. The SHO-Kalkaji shall serve a copy of today's order to the SDM-Kalkaji so that he can remain present on the next date of hearing. Redevelopment of the Mandir

8. A status report dated 14th March, 2023 has been placed on record by the ld. Administrator. As per the report, a meeting between the two Architects - Mr. Goonmeet Singh Chauhan and Ms. Himanshi Kaushik as also the ld. Administrator, and the pujaris took place on 10th March 2023. It is informed that a proposal for division of responsibility between the architects was proposed by Mr. Chauhan on which the pujaris are yet to revert.

9. Mr. Chauhan and Ms. Himanshi Kaushik, both the architects are present in the Court. They submit that within a period of four weeks, they will finalise the division of work between themselves and place the same on record.

10. The division of work will be placed on record by means of a table/chart by the next date of hearing. For the said purpose, if any further meetings are required, the same shall be coordinated by the two architects irrespective of the presence of the parties. The meetings shall be held between the architects and the final agreed plan shall be put up. Removal of street vendors from the periphery of the Mandir

11. Insofar as the 51 street vendors registered with the MCD vending on the periphery of the Kalkaji Mandir who were directed to be moved from the periphery of the Kalkaji mandir vide order dated 14th February, 2023 are concerned, they have already been moved to the western side of Shamshan Ghat Road, Kalkaji as recorded in order dated 22nd February, 2023. On the last date of hearing, the Court was informed that more street vendors are there who are also stated to be registered with the MCD. In view of the said submission, the Court had passed the following direction:

“15. If that is the position, the said 28 street vendors, or any other vendors claiming parity with the 51 street vendors registered with the SDMC, may appear before the Id. Administrator on 5th March, 2023 (Sunday) on which date, concerned officials from the SDMC shall also clarify the position to the Id. Administrator who shall put up a report on the next date of hearing after taking all the relevant factors into consideration.”

12. Today, Ms. Samapika Biswal, ld. Counsel, has informed the Court that in the meeting dated 05th March, 2023, which was also attended by MCD Officials, the street vendors were given time till 9th March, 2023 to submit their representations along with relevant documents. It is her submission that 101 representations have been received which have been forwarded by the ld. Administrator to the MCD.

13. Let ld. counsel for the MCD revert within 10 days qua the status of the said street vendors upon which appropriate directions shall be issued by the ld. Administrator. Removal of unauthorised occupants from dharamshalas and remaining jhuggis in the Kalkaji Mandir

14. Status Report dated 14th March, 2023, submitted by the ld. Administrator notes that three representations have been received from unauthorised occupants of the Tantrik Dharamshala, Ramnath Dharamshala, and Moni Baba Dharamshala seeking protection from eviction.

25,304 characters total

15. Vide order dated 3rd February, 2023, the Supreme Court had extended time for vacating the dharamshalas till 15th March, 2023, beyond which date, the authorities were given the liberty to take the possession forcibly. The said order reads as under: “ I.A. No. 87139/2022 Application for impleadment is rejected. The order dated 09.01.2023 passed in I.A. NO. 108591/2022 will equally apply, subject to the modification as directed in this order. In view of the request made by the learned counsel for the applicants, we grant time to vacate the premises/property by 15.03.2023. In case the applicants do not vacate the premises/property by 15.03.2023, it will be open to the authorities to take action including taking Police aid and assistance to get the premises/property vacated and forcibly take possession. It is stated by the learned counsel for the State and authorities that the applicants and their families will be accommodated in the temporary night shelters/rain basera.”

16. In view of the above order of the Supreme Court, the time granted for vacating the premises expires today. Accordingly, the unauthorised occupants of dharamshalas and jhuggis shall now be removed from the Kalkaji Mandir premises by the SHO, Kalkaji within 48 hours and no further time shall be granted to any unauthorised occupant. Allotment of small/ large temporary Shops

17. The 10th Report of the Ld. Administrator noted that temporary shops complex have been lying vacant since November, 2022 as a majority of the shopkeepers have expressed inability to pay the tehbazari amount fixed by the Court for small shops. In view of said submission the Court on, 22nd February, 2023 observed as under:

“9. One last opportunity is granted by the Court to all the allottees of the various shops which have been- temporarily constructed to approach the ld. Administrator and take possession of the shops after giving undertakings to deposit the Tehbazari directed by this Court. 10. In case any of the allottees does not wish to take the allotment of the shop, orders would be passed for cancellation of their allotments on the next date of hearing. This shall be the last opportunity to all the allottees to approach the ld. Administrator and to do the needful.”

18. The status report submitted by the ld. Administrator states that in view of order passed by the Court, a public notice dated 1st March 2023 was issued calling upon the allotees of the small and large shops to indicate their willingness to take possession of the shops and a meeting was fixed for 5th March, 2023. Thereafter, a representation dated 5th March, 2023 was received by the ld. Administrator to the effect that the tehbazari of Rs.30,000/- for smaller temporary shops fixed by this Court is on the higher side.

19. In view of the above situation, it is necessary to summarise below the manner in which these small and large temporary shops in Kalkaji Mandir premises came to be constructed and the tehbazari amount was fixed. The said chronology is as under: i. There were a large number of shopkeepers who were unauthorised occupants in the Kalkaji Mandir. They had no right to occupy the Mandir premises which was in a chaotic condition. The unauthorised shopkeepers, as per various reports which were received by the Court, were completely haphazardly selling their wares. There was no regulation of any kind in the premises. Some were paying amounts to occupy the shops to various claimants. A large number of shopkeepers were in litigation. This Court had, vide order dated 27th September, 2021, while appointing an Administrator, taken a compassionate view of the matter considering that these shopkeepers were selling samagri, prasad etc., in the Mandir premises for several years. The said order dated 27th September, 2021 reads as under:

“98. Ld. counsel for the various parties appearing before this Court, the Local Commissioner, the Court Receivers, as also the SDMC/ Delhi Police, are all unanimous in their submissions to this Court that the shopkeepers, tehbazari holders and other occupants are not paying proper tehbazari/licence fees either to the Committee, or to the baridaars, in a regulated manner. As per the report of the Delhi police, there are more than a hundred
shops that are operating from the Mandir and making profits.
99. The manner in which the shopkeepers have constructed their shops has created obstructions in the movement of devotees, as is evident from the photographs which have been placed on record. For the purpose of the safety of devotees and others in the Mandir, it is essential that unauthorised occupants/shopkeepers/tehbazari holders/Chabutara holders who do not have any valid legal rights to occupy the same, are liable to be removed in coordination with the Delhi Police and the SDMC.
100. Accordingly, it is directed that all unauthorized occupants/encroachers, who do not enjoy valid tehbazari licenses, and who are in unauthorized occupation of the said premises, would be liable to be removed, until and unless there is a Court order protecting the said occupant. All encroachments in the Mandir premises, and complex and peripheral areas are also directed to be removed. Xxx
108. The mandate of the ld. Administrator and his team shall be to take all measures as set out in para 103 above and shall also include the following: xxx
(xviii) The ld. Administrator, may, also allocate designated spaces for the purpose of sale of samagries, flowers, for ceremonies like vahan puja/ mundane, and for the sale of Agarbattis, prashada, and other worship related items. An attempt shall be made by the ld. Administrator to allot these designated spaces to occupants who have been operating in the Mandir premises for long years. It is made clear that there shall be no residences which shall be permitted to be made with these shops/ designated areas. While allotting such space, it shall be ensured that the access to the Mandir would not be impeded in any manner.” ii. By the said order an Administrator was also appointed by the Court which direction was challenged before the Supreme Court vide SLP

(C) Diary No. 9073/2022. The said SLP was dismissed by the

Supreme Court vide order dated 25th March, 2022. iii. Insofar as the tehbazari amounts in respect of the said temporary shops are concerned, vide order dated 9th December, 2021, it was observed that the said amount would be fixed by the Court. Thereafter on 21st December, 2021, the Court had directed that interested persons may submit their bids and the ld. Administrator was directed to prepare a list all such persons who were willing to take allotment. The relevant portion of the order dated 21st December, 2021 reads as under:

“15. It is made clear that bids may be submitted by various shopkeepers/other allottees who are interested in obtaining either the temporary shops or temporary kiosks, as per the public notice released by the ld. Administrator. 16. On the basis of the bids received, the ld. Administrator may prepare a list of all such persons who are willing to take allotment of these shops/kiosks. In addition, the baridaars at the Mandir would also be required to contribute for the creation of these temporary structures. The exact ratio of the contributions etc., shall be finalised by the ld. Administrator. 17. Finally, on the basis of the bids received and discussions with baridaars, the shopkeepers, the Civic Agencies and the ld. Architect, the ld. Administrator shall place on record a final report for creation of temporary structures (shops and kiosks) at the Kalkaji
Mandir, for this Court’s consideration and approval.
18. For receiving the report of the ld. Administrator in respect of the said meetings and for perusal of the report for creation of temporary shops/kiosks, as well as ascertaining the status of the unauthorised construction, list these matters on 14th January, 2022 at 2:30 pm.” iv. Thereafter, lists of allotees for both small temporary shops and large temporary shops was finalzed by the ld. Administrator. Bids had been called in respect of the larger shops and the highest bid which was received was Rs.3,31,000/-. Insofar as small shops are concerned, in Report No.6 submitted by the ld. Administrator it was suggested that tehbazari be fixed at Rs.1000/- per day for all shopkeepers other than widows, and Rs.500/- per day for widows. It was on the basis of the said recommendation of the ld. Administrator that the Court fixed the tehbazari amount at Rs.500/- for widows and Rs.1,000/- per day for all other shopkeepers. The relevant portion of the order dated 9th September, 2022 which records the same reads as under:
“54. The Architect has reported that the small temporary shops are ready for allotment. As per the ld. Administrator, 100 shopkeepers have been finalized who have deposited a sum of Rs.30,000/- each for the purposes of construction of small temporary shops. The list of the said persons is available with the ld. Administrator. 55. As recorded in Report No.6, the recommendation of the ld. Administrator in respect of tehbazari amount for the smaller temporary shops, is as under: “37. The undersigned is of the view that the monthly tehbazari for the small temporary shops may be fixed at Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand only) per day uniformly for all shopkeepers. The
undersigned has received representations from many widows who have sought reduction in the monthly tehbazari. On a compassionate view of the matter, the undersigned recommends that the monthly tehbazari for the small temporary shops may be fixed at Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred only) per day for widows.”

56. Pursuant to the above recommendations of the ld. Administrator, the tehbazari amount is fixed at Rs.1,000/- per day for all the shopkeepers who are allotted the small temporary shops. In respect of widows, the tehbazari amount shall be fixed at Rs. 500/- per day for the said shops. Depending upon the assessment of revenues which the ld. Administrator may make, the modification of the tehbazari amount would be considered by this Court, at a later stage.

57. Accordingly, allotment of all the small temporary shops shall commence from 14th September, 2022, as per the terms set out hereinabove. It is made clear that the deposit of the tehbazari amount for the first month shall be made by the shopkeepers at the time of allotment.” v. On the basis of the recommendations made, the allotments were made by the ld. Administrator and the tehbazari were fixed by the Court at Rs.30,000/- per month and Rs.1,00,000/- per month for the small and the large shops respectively. vi. During the entire process of renovation and redevelopment of the Kalkaji Mandir, small and large temporary shops were constructed, under the supervision of the Court, by Mr. Goonmeet Singh Chauhan, the Court appointed architect. The allottees who were finalised by the Ld. Administrator had contributed Rs. 1 lakh for large temporary shops and Rs. 30,000/- for small temporary shops for the said construction. vii. However, after the construction of the shops, none of the allottees have taken possession and have moved repeated applications for reduction of tehbazari. On 22nd September, 2022 when the Court was considering one such application CM APPL.42041/2022 filed by the shopkeepers and the Short Report filed by the ld. Administrator seeking modification of the tehbazari amount, the Court observed as under:

“14. The present application and the Short Report seek modification of these directions insofar as the tehbazari amount is concerned. 15. At the outset, this Court notes that the construction of the temporary shops and large shops has been supervised and monitored by this Court for almost a year now. Considerable expenses have already been incurred in the construction of these temporary shops, on the understanding that the shopkeepers who would be allotted such shops would pay the requisite amounts of tehbazari, which would also offset expenses. The intention behind the construction of these temporary shops was to ensure that there is no unauthorized hawking or haphazard sale of puja samagri or goods within or on the periphery of the Mandir premises, which hampers access to the Mandir for devotees. The space for the temporary shops was chosen after the ld. Administrator and the Architect extensively interacted with the baridaars, pujaris and the shopkeepers and surveyed the premises, as also after considering the expected revenue to be generated by such shops based on past experience. The temporary shops are fully constructed and are ready for allotment. Under such circumstances, owing to the proceedings and chronology of events that have taken place in these matters, this Court is not inclined to modify the tehbazari amount. The tehbazari amount shall be payable as directed in the order dated 9th September,
2022, extracted above. The allotment of the shops shall now be done in terms of the said order within next 2 days. If any of the shopkeepers/allottees are not willing to pay the tehbazari amounts, the allotment of such shopkeepers shall be cancelled by the ld. Administrator and the allotments can be made to such persons i.e., other shopkeepers or pujaris, as the ld. Administrator deems appropriate after verification of their credentials.
16. This Court further notes that vide order dated 9th September 2022, this Court had directed payment of the first monthly tehbazari amount at the time of allotment. However, in view of the circumstances discussed above, insofar as the payment of the first payment of Rs.30,000/is concerned, such shopkeepers, who are allottees, are now granted time till 10th October, 2022, to pay the first monthly tehbazari amount.
17. At this stage, Ms. Shilpa Goel, ld. Counsel, submits that some pujaris are also willing to seek allotment of temporary small shops. Ms. Biswal, ld. Counsel for the ld. Administrator, submits that the said pujaris had bid for the large shops, but are not part of the current list of potential allottees for small shops. In this view of the matter, it is made clear that after the current list of potential allottees already finalized by the ld. Administrator, is exhausted, if there are any vacant small shops and if any pujaris/shopkeepers, are willing to bid for the vacant temporary small shops, the ld. Administrator shall consider the same. In the larger interest of the smooth ingress and egress of the devotees especially during the forthcoming Navratra period, the prayer for setting up temporary tables in the Kalkaji Mandir premises is rejected.” viii. The said shops are stated to be lying vacant since November, 2022. The ld. Administrator has also been approached by the allottees. The ld. Administrator had first recommended that the tehbazari be reduced to Rs.15,000/- per month. However, vide report dated 22nd September, 2022, he has recommended that the tehbazari be reduced to Rs.5,000/- per month for smaller shops as interim arrangement. The said recommendation has been reiterated in Report dated 11th February, 2023.

20. The Court has considered the matter and it is seen from the record that the shopkeepers were, for several years, paying tehbazari to the Baridaars/Pujaris. Today, it has been brought to the notice of the Court by ld. Counsel appearing for the small shopkeepers that this issue was also subject matter of suits which were pending before the District Courts as well and the tehbazari being paid by the shopkeepers can be seen from the record of the said courts. For example, in the year 2003, tehbazari to the tune of Rs.7,000/- per month was being paid for a 12 x 12 shop per month. It is submitted by ld. Counsel for the ld. Administrator that no tehbazari has been paid by the allotees of the large shops.

21. This Court notes that the footfall at the Kalkaji Mandir is substantial. There are thousands of devotees who visit the Mandir on a daily basis. The shops were conducting brisk business selling various wares including Samagri etc., Considering the various factors, ie., the tehbazari amounts historically paid, the number of visitors, the deliberations with the allottees, the report of the administrator recommending the amount and the future prospect and enjoyment by allottees of the shops, this Court is of the opinion that the tehbazari is not liable to be reduced.

22. The allotments to all the small shops and larger shops which were made earlier, in view of the fact that the allottees are unwilling to pay the tehbazari amount fixed by the Court, shall stand cancelled. Accordingly, this Court directs the ld. Administrator to go ahead and make recommendations for a public auction of both the small and large temporary shops, on a license basis, without giving any priority to the earlier allotees whatsoever.

23. The amounts, already paid by the small and large shopkeepers, shall stand forfeited, in as much as the non taking of possession of the shops has resulted in adverse consequences to the administration of the Mandir as devotees have been inconvenienced and unauthorised hawkers are being encouraged.

24. At this stage, ld. Counsel for small shopkeepers submits that the amount being paid in 2003 for a 12 x 12 shop was Rs.1,500/- per month and not 7,000/- as stated earlier by him. In response to this, some of the Counsels submit that this was purely an interim measure. Either way, this Court is of the opinion that the tehbazari amount does not deserve to be reduced. Arrangement for Navratras starting from 22nd March, 2023

25. For the Navratra period starting from 22nd March, 2023 to 30th March, 2023, the following arrangements is directed: i. The Delhi Police shall deploy the requisite number of police personnel in three shifts along with barricades for the management of the crowd as also to ensure access to the Kalkaji Mandir premises in an orderly manner. It shall be the responsibility of the Delhi Police to ensure that there is no stampede or any such kind of heavy crowding situation and the crowd is managed properly. ii. Two ambulance and two fire brigades shall also be made available to tender to any emergency situation in the mandir during the Navratras. iii. The Health Department GNCTD, and SDM, Kalkaji shall deploy 100 Civil Defence volunteers in two shift each, in the morning and evening as also one doctor and two paramedics. iv. Delhi Jal Board shall ensure that there is continuous supply of potable drinking water to the Piyaos within the Mandir. It shall also be ensured that there is no blockage or leakage in the drains around the Mandir. v. BSES is directed to ensure that there is uninterrupted supply of electricity to the Mandir during the aforementioned period. A letter dated 1st March, 2023, has already been sent by the ld. Administrator to BSES for the aforesaid purpose. vi.

DUSIB shall deploy sixteen mobile toilets along with the requisite staff to ensure proper cleanliness of the said toilets. vii. PWD as also the DDA shall repair the wall on the outer ring road side on the periphery of the Kalkaji Mandir which is stated to be broken at numerous places, and the fence separating the DDA land from the Mandir premises area respectively. viii. In order to meet the requirements of the devotees during the Navratra period, for the period between 22nd March, 2023 to 30th March, 2023, all the small temporary shops shall be permitted to be used for selling of samagri, prashad and other pooja related items upon the payment of tehbazari of Rs.10,000/- for the nine days period. For aforesaid purpose, the existing allottees, if willing, may be permitted to sell their wares during the nine days navratra period on advance payment of the amount fixed by the Court. The said permission to the allottees is purely temporary in nature and only for the nine days period. No rights shall accrue to them for operating the shops during this period. An undertaking to this effect shall also be obtained. ix. The parking in the Kalkaji Mandir premises shall be regulated by the Delhi Police during the navratra period along with the MCD. For the said purpose, ld. Administrator may give directions to the concerned MCD agency. As an interim arrangement, the revenue generated during the entire period from the Parking, shall be deposited by the MCD into the account of the ld. Administrator, after deducting the amounts incurred by the said agencies. The same shall be subject to further orders of the Court.

26. List on 19th April, 2023 at 3:30.

PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGE MARCH 15, 2023 Rahul/DJ/MR/SK (Corrected & released on 18th March, 2023)