Usha International Limited v. Tarun Arora Trading as Krishan Enterprises

Delhi High Court · 20 Mar 2023 · 2023:DHC:2005
C. Hari Shankar
CS(COMM) 122/2022
2023:DHC:2005
civil appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court decreed the trademark infringement suit based on the defendant's compliance affidavit confirming no infringing stock, negating the need for delivery up orders.

Full Text
Translation output
Neutral Citation Number : 2023:DHC:2005
CS(COMM) 122/2022
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CS (COMM) 122/2022
USHA INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ..... Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Jithin M. George, Adv.
VERSUS
TARUN ARORA TRADING
AS KRISHAN ENTERPRISES ..... Defendant
Through: Mr. Himanshu Batham, Adv. with Mr. Tarun Arora in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
JUDGMENT
(ORAL)
20.03.2023

1. Mr. Tarun Arora is present in person along with Mr. Himanshu Batham.

2. In terms of para 14 of the order dated 20th July 2022, a compliance affidavit has been filed by Mr. Tarun Arora, in which it is stated that the defendant has no stock of the products bearing the plaintiff’s marks.

3. Mr. George, learned Counsel for the plaintiff does not dispute the said factual position.

4. As such, there can be no order directing delivery up, as prayed in the suit.

5. Costs and damages already stand awarded by order dated 20th July 2022. Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2005 CS(COMM) 122/2022

6. The suit, therefore, does not survive for further adjudication.

7. The suit, accordingly, stands decreed in terms of the order dated 20th July 2022.

8. Let a decree-sheet be drawn up accordingly.

C.HARI SHANKAR, J MARCH 20, 2023