Harish K. Saxena v. Youth Hostels Association of India

Delhi High Court · 16 Mar 2023 · 2023:DHC:2114
Tushar Rao Gedela
CM(M) 419/2023
2023:DHC:2114
civil petition_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court held that a Trial Court must not make premature factual observations on affidavit paragraphs beyond pleadings and expunged such observations to uphold fair trial rights.

Full Text
Translation output
Neutral Citation Number 2023:DHC:2114
CM(M) 419/2023 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 16.03.2023
CM(M) 419/2023
YOUTH HOSTELS ASSOCIATION OF INDIA ..... Petitioner
versus
DR HARISH K SAXENA & ANR. ..... Respondents
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner : Mr. Thakur Sumit, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Suhail Sehgal and Mr. Chandan, Adv. for R-1
CORAM:
JUDGMENT
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. (ORAL)
[ The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode ]

1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 12581/2023 (Exemption)

2. Application stands disposed of.

3. With the consent of the parties and also keeping in view the fact that the learned Trial Court has made observations on the merits of the contents of the evidence by way of the affidavit, by categorising those paragraphs as explanation to several aspects of the suit, simultaneously also observed on the basis of judgments, that the paragraphs which do not form part of the pleadings can be eschewed and expunged at the CM(M) 419/2023 & CM APPL. 12580/2023 (Interim Relief) Neutral Citation Number 2023:DHC:2114 CM(M) 419/2023 2 stage of cross examination or even at the later stage when an objection to that extent is taken by the parties, the impugned order needs to be corrected. If the learned Trial Court was of the opinion that the petitioner had opportunity in law to object and question the paragraphs which were alleged to be beyond pleadings, then it could have simply noted the same and proceeded with cross examination, without commenting or making observations on the merits of such paragraphs. The moment learned Trial Court made factual observations, it would tend to bias one of the parties, which is impermissible. The contradiction is apparent on the face of it and cannot be sustained in law.

4. Accordingly, para 8 of the impugned order dated 28.02.2023 passed in CS SCJ No. 56685/2016 titled “Harish K. Saxena Vs. Youth Hostels Association of India & Anr.” is expunged from the impugned order leaving the other paragraphs of the impugned order intact.

5. Needless to observe that the petitioner/defendant has indelible rights to put all questions relatable to the affidavit whether arising from the petition/suit or those paragraphs alleged to be beyond the pleadings and the Trial Court shall note the same and deal with such objections at the stage of final hearing.

6. The petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. MARCH 16, 2023