Tarsem Singh v. DG CISF

Delhi High Court · 21 Apr 2023 · 2023:DHC:2733-DB
Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna
W.P.(C) 5084/2023
2023:DHC:2733-DB
administrative other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the CISF authorities to decide the petitioner's pending representation against his transfer within a stipulated time, without adjudicating the merits of the transfer.

Full Text
Translation output
Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2733-DB
W.P.(C) 5084/2023
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 21st April, 2023
W.P.(C) 5084/2023 & CM APPL. 19874-75/2023
TARSEM SINGH ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. P. Sureshan, Advocate
VERSUS
DG CISF ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Senior Panel Counsel with Ms. Poonam, GP, Ms. Mishika Pandita and Mr. Shaurya Katoch, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
JUDGMENT
(oral)

1. Vide the present petition, petitioner is seeking directions to the respondent, DG CISF, New Delhi, to retain the petitioner at any CISF units of North Sector only at his fourth service tenure in terms of the circular dated 25.09.2017; quashing and setting aside of the order dated 24.03.2023 qua petitioner and consequential order dated 14.04.2023 wherein petitioner has been transferred from the present Unit of IGI Airport New Delhi to Oil Duliajan, Assam along with costs of litigation in favour of petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that pursuant to impugned order dated 24.03.2023, petitioner made a representation dated 29.03.2023, 16:41 Neutral Citation Number: 2023:DHC:2733-DB W.P.(C) 5084/2023 however, the same has not been decided by the respondents till date.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents, who is appearing on advance notice, has assured this Court that the representations mentioned above shall be decided at the earliest.

4. In view of above, we hereby direct the respondents to decide the abovementioned representation filed by the petitioner on or before 28.04.2023 and communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner within two days thereafter with a reasoned order.

5. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications also stand disposed of.

6. Needless to say, if the petitioner feels aggrieved by the decision of the respondents on his representation, he may approach the appropriate forum.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE (NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA)

JUDGE APRIL 21, 2023 16:41