Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Decision delivered on: 02.05.2023
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2. Appellant
Through: Mr Sanjay Kumar, Sr Standing Counsel with Ms Hemlata Rawat and
Ms Easha Kadian, Jr Standing Counsels.
Through: None.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):
CM No.22088/2023 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 2 days in re-filing the appeal]
JUDGMENT
1. This is an application moved on behalf of the appellant/revenue seeking condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal. 1.[1] According to the appellant/revenue, there is a delay of 2 days.
2. For the reasons given in the application, the delay is condoned.
3. The application is disposed of, in the aforesaid terms.
4. This appeal concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18.
5. What is noticed is that, even according to the appellant/revenue, the tax effect in this particular AY is only Rs.14,41,972/-.
6. Needless to state, tax effect has to be ascertained for each AY. This is evident upon a bare perusal of paragraph 5 of circular no.3/2018 dated 11.07.2018, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). For the sake of convenience, the said paragraph is extracted hereafter:
7. In these circumstances, this appeal is closed in the aforesaid terms.
8. Needless to add, the closure of this appeal will not affect the lodging the appeals by the revenue concerning other AYs, where tax effect is above the prescribed threshold limit.
9. It goes without saying, the question of law raised by the appellant/revenue in this matter is kept open for consideration in an appropriate matter.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J GIRISH KATHPALIA, J MAY 2, 2023 aj