Aishwary Ghai & Anr. v. Class 21A Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi High Court · 19 May 2023 · 2023:DHC:3485-DB
V. Kameswar Rao; Tara Vitasta Ganju
FAO (COMM) 111/2023
2023:DHC:3485-DB
civil appeal_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court modified the interim injunction restraining appellants from operating their YouTube channels, directing expeditious disposal of the underlying arbitration petition while ensuring parties' right to be heard.

Full Text
Translation output
2023:DHC:3485-DB
FAO (COMM) 111/2023 Page 1
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: May 19, 2023
FAO (COMM) 111/2023 & CM Appls. 26826-26827/2023
AISHWARY GHAI & ANR. ..... Appellants
Through: Mr. Ramesh Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sakshi Mehley, Ms. Harshita Kumar, Mr. Sajal Manchanda and
Ms. Sakshi Dewangan, Advs.
VERSUS
CLASS 21A TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Advait Ghosh, Mr. Anant Patro, and Mr. Mrinal Chaudhary, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL)
CM Appl. 26827/2023 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
FAO (COMM) 111/2023
JUDGMENT

1. This appeal impugns the order dated May 9, 2023 passed by the learned District Judge, Commercial Court (North), Rohini, Delhi in a petition filed by the respondent under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 whereby the learned District Judge has FAO (COMM) 111/2023 Page 2 restrained the appellants from operating their Youtube Channels and social media platforms for imparting tuitions to the students till May 29, 2023.

2. Mr. Ramesh Singh, learned Sr. Counsel appearing for the appellants has made many submissions including the fact that the interim order could not have been passed without eliciting a reply to the petition.

3. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondent would justify the interim order. He states, despite order dated May 9, 2023, the appellants are operating the Youtube Channels and social media platforms, in that sense, they are in contempt of the order and the petition is liable to be dismissed. This submission is vehemently disputed by Mr. Singh.

4. Without going into the rival submissions made by the counsel for the parties, we are of the view that the date of May 29, 2023 needs to be advanced and we accordingly advance it to May 22, 2023 before the District Judge.

5. The appellants herein shall file reply to the petition by sending an advance copy to the respondent by tomorrow evening. Respondent herein shall send advance copy of the rejoinder to the reply to be filed by the appellants by Sunday evening. Both reply and the rejoinder shall be submitted to the District Judge on the next date of hearing.

6. Suffice to state that the learned District Judge shall hear the parties and dispose of the petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 immediately thereafter.

7. All the pleas of the parties are left open to be submitted before FAO (COMM) 111/2023 Page 3 the learned District Judge.

8. With the above, the appeal stands disposed of. CM Appl. 26826/2023 Dismissed as infructuous.

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J MAY 19, 2023