Anis Ahmed Saifi v. State and Anr.

Delhi High Court · 01 Jun 2023 · 2023:DHC:4808
Dinesh Kumar Sharma
CRL.M.C. 4227/2023
2023:DHC:4808
criminal petition_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 324 IPC in a matrimonial dispute after the parties amicably settled, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 4227/2023
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 4227/2023
ANIS AHMED SAIFI ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Gayuatri Nandwani and Ms. Mudita Sharda, Advs. with petitioners.
VERSUS
STATE AND ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State and SI Sandeep Yadav, PS Palam
Village.
Ms. Tara Narula, Adv. (DHCLSC)
AND Mr. S. D. Reddy, Advs. for R- 2/complainant.
R-2 in person.
Date of Decision: 01.06.2023.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
JUDGMENT
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J.
(Oral)
CRL.M.A. 15853/2023
Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.

1. The present petition has been filed under section 482 Cr.P,C seeking quashing of case FIR No. 99/2022 dated 07.07.2022 under Sections 498A/324/34 IPC registered at PS Palam Village, New Delhi.

2. Respondent no.2 states that she has been residing with her husband (Anish Ahmad Seifi) for the last one year and now there is no dispute between them.

3. Chargesheet has also been filed under section 498a/323/34 IPC

4. Respondent No. 2 states that she is residing voluntarily at her maternal house and does not want to pursue the present petition, she has no objection Since the parties are residing together and have settled the matter, she has no objection dated 07.07.2022 FIR No. 99/2022 under section 498A/323/34 IPC

5. Section 482 CrPC acknowledges the inherent power of the high court to secure the ends of justice. In cases where the offences are not compoundable in nature, the parties on account of an amicable settlement invoke the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the proceedings on the plea that continuance thereof would merely be an abuse of process of law.

6. It has repeatedly been held by the Apex Court that in the matrimonial disputes, if the parties have settled the matter between themselves amicably, it is the duty of Courts to encourage the same. Reliance can be placed on B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 SCC 675; Yashpal Chaudhrani and Others vs. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) and Another;

7. I consider that there would be no purpose of continuing with the trial as the parties have entered into the settlement voluntarily without any fear, force and coercion, and have decided to put quietus to the proceedings. It was a matrimonial dispute which has been amicably settled and thus the parties must be given a chance to live together peacefully.

8. In view of the submissions made, the present FIR No. 99/2022 under Sections 498A/323/34 IPC registered at PS Palam Village, New Delhi. is quashed.

9. The present petition stand disposed of.

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J JUNE 1, 2023/AR..