Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 10th July, 2023
MUGADA VENKATARAMANA ..... Petitioner
For the Petitioner: Mr. R.K. Ojha, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Siddharth Khatana, Sr. Panel
Counsel with Mr. Rattan Negi, D.C., Coast Guard.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
JUDGMENT
1. By this application, petitioner seeks correction of a typographical error that has crept in paragraphs 3, 7 and 8 of order dated 23.06.2023.
2. Learned counsel for respondent concedes that the same is a typographical error. Both the counsel submit that the order needs to be corrected and after correction, the said paragraphs 3 and 7 would read as under:-
3. Both learned counsel also agree that Para-8 can be deleted in its entirety. Hence, Para-8 is deleted from the order.
4. Application is, accordingly, disposed of in the above terms.
5. This order shall be uploaded as a corrigendum to order dated 23.06.2023. W.P.(C) 8554/2023 & CM APPL. 32545/2023
6. Learned counsel for respondent further submits that respondents have agreed to implement the order dated 23.06.2023 and induct the petitioner under the recruitment process. He submits that since the basic training of the existing batch has already commenced, it has been decided to induct petitioner in the Stage – 3 of the next batch, which is to commence in the month of September – October, 2023 and subject to petitioner clearing the requisite medical and other formalities, he shall be inducted for training along with the next batch.
7. In view of the above statement, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner stands readdressed and he does not wish to press the petition any further.
8. In view of the assurance given by the respondent that they are implementing the order dated 23.06.2023 and inducting the petitioner in the Stage – 3 along with the next batch, nothing further survives in the petition.
9. Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J MANOJ JAIN, J JULY 10, 2023