Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 7624/2023
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Decision delivered on: 02.08.2023
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Decision delivered on: 02.08.2023
W.P.(C) 7624/2023
PRAFUL SURANA ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms Mitika Choudhary, Adv.
PRAFUL SURANA ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms Mitika Choudhary, Adv.
VERSUS
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 30 1 & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Gaurav Gupta, Sr. Standing Counsel.
Mr Chiranjiv Kumar & Mukesh Sachdeva, Advs. for U.O.I.
Through: Mr Gaurav Gupta, Sr. Standing Counsel.
Mr Chiranjiv Kumar & Mukesh Sachdeva, Advs. for U.O.I.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):
CM No.39140/2023
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):
CM No.39140/2023
JUDGMENT
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM No. 39139/2023
2. This is an application filed seeking recall of order dated 30.05.2023.
3. A perusal of the order would show that the petitioner’s counsel, i.e., Ms Mitika Choudhary, had made a submission before the Court that she has instruction to withdraw the writ petition, as the assessment order has been passed.
4. Since liberty was sought to take recourse to an appropriate remedy as W.P.(C) 7624/2023 per law, leeway in that behalf was granted.
5. It is not disputed by Ms Choudhary that since the time order dated 30.05.2023 was passed, a statutory appeal has been preferred.
6. In our view, this application is completely without merit.
7. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.