Naresh Chandra v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Delhi High Court · 09 Aug 2023 · 2023:DHC:5669
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
CM(M) 1277/2023
2023:DHC:5669
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition challenging a demolition order, directing the Municipal Corporation not to enforce demolition until the pending appeals before the Appellate Tribunal are decided.

Full Text
Translation output
CM(M) 1277/2023
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 09.08.2023
CM(M) 1277/2023 & CM APPLs. 40656-57/2023
NARESH CHANDRA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ankit Jain and Mr. Varun Phogat, Advocates.
VERSUS
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ..... Respondent
Through: Ms. Chetanya Singh and Mr. Chetan Sharma, Advocates for MCD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
JUDGMENT
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J (ORAL):
CM APPL. 40657/2023 (for exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of.
CM(M) 1277/2023 & CM APPL. 40656/2023

1. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 03.08.2023 passed by the Appellate Tribunal Municipal Corporation of Delhi (‘Tribunal’) in Appeal No.464/2023, whereby the ATMCD vide order dated 03.08.2023 has declined to grant interim relief to the Petitioner herein against the demolition order dated 14.07.2023.

1.1. It is a matter of record that the basis for issuance of the said demolition CM(M) 1277/2023 order includes the ground that the sanctioned plan for the subject property also stands revoked by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (‘MCD’) on 07.07.2023. The Petitioner herein has separately challenged the revocation order in Appeal No. 463/2023.

2. The learned counsel for the Respondent, MCD who appears on advance notice on instructions from Mr. Yashwant Singh, Assistant Engineer, states that both appeals i.e., appeal no. 463/2023 and appeal no. 464/2023 are next listed before the Tribunal at 11.08.2023 and are expected to be heard and decided expeditiously. He states on instructions that the Respondent will not enforce the demolition order until the final disposal of the said appeals.

3. The learned counsel for the Petitioners states that he undertakes before this Court that no adjournment will be sought by the Petitioner before the Tribunal and the Petitioner will be duly represented through a counsel to address arguments on 11.08.2023 and any subsequent date fixed by the Tribunal.

3.1. He states that the Respondent be bound down to the statement made before this Court and the petition be disposed of in terms thereafter.

4. The statement of the Petitioner and the Respondent made before this Court is taken on record and parties are bound down to the same.

5. In view of the statement made by the Respondent, the present petition is disposed of. The pending application stands disposed of.