Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 6818/2023
DEEPAK KAPOOR & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Ms. Jyoti Kumar M., Adv. with petitioners.
Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP and SI Durga Prasad, PS Rajauri Gargen.
Mr. Taranpreet Singh, Mr. Dharm Prakash and Mr. Md. Shamem, Adv. with R-2.
Date of Decision: 20.09.2023.
JUDGMENT
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
1. The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of case FIR NO. 0902/2021 dated 23.10.2023 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Rajouri Garden, West Delhi.
2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that Respondent no.2/complainant married petitioner no.1 on 27.11.2014 in accordance with the Hindu Rites and Ceremonies. However, on account of temperamental differences and mental incompatibility, the parties started living separately since 10.01.2020 and instituted multiple litigations against each other and their respective families including the present FIR.
3. Learned Counsel further submits that during the pendency of the proceedings, the parties have resolved their disputes amicably and in furtherance thereof they have entered into a settlement agreement dated 23.08.2023 before the Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari. As per the settlement it has been agreed between the parties that the petitioner shall pay Rs. 2,50,000/- (Rupees two lacs fifty thousand only) in full and final settlement of the entire dispute to respondent NO. 2/complainant.
4. Pursuant to the settlement, a mutual divorce petition was also filed and a decree of divorce was granted vide order dated 09.05.2023 passed by Learned Judge, Family Courts, Tis Hazari.
5. Furthermore, the Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that since the parties have resolved all their differences amicably, therefore, it would be in the interest of justice to quash FIR No. 0902/2021 dated 23.10.2023 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Rajouri Garden, West Delhi all the proceedings emanating therefrom.
6. It is settled that the inherent powers under section 482 of the Code are required to be exercised to secure the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of any court. Further, the High Court can quash non- compoundable offences after considering the nature of the offence and the amicable settlement between the concerned parties. Supreme Court and this Court have repeatedly held that the cases arising out of matrimonial differences should be put to a quietus if the parties have reached an amicable settlement. Reliance may be placed upon: B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana, (2003) 4 SCC 675;K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A. Deepa, (2013) 5 SCC 226; Yashpal Chaudhrani and Others vs. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) and Another, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 8179.
7. Both parties are present in court and have duly been identified by the IO. Respondent no. 2 submits that she has entered the settlement voluntarily without any fear, force or coercion. She submits that other petitions have already been withdrawn or dismissed. And since the marriage between the parties has also been dissolved by a decree of divorce by mutual consent order/judgment dated 09.05.2023, she has no objection if FIR No. 0902/2021 dated 23.10.2023 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Rajouri Garden, West Delhi and all the proceedings emanating therefrom.
8. The settlement agreement provides for the following Terms and conditions:
9. Taking into account the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, this court considers that the parties have entered into an amicable settlement out of their own free will, without any fear, force or coercion and they should be given an opportunity to lead their lives peacefully. No purpose will be served in continuing with the trial.
10. In view of the above, FIR No. 0902/2021 dated 23.10.2023 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS Rajouri Garden, West Delhi and all the other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
11. The present petition stands disposed of.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J SEPTEMBER 20, 2023