P. CHANDRIKA v. THE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONER OF URBAN LAND CEILING AND URBAN LAND TAX AND ANR.

Supreme Court of India · 15 Mar 2022
Uday Umesh Lalit; S. Ravindra Bhat; Hrishikesh Roy
Review Petition (Civil) No. of 2022
property petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed the Review Petition challenging possession of excess urban land taken before repeal of the Urban Land Ceiling Act, holding no error apparent on record to warrant interference.

Full Text
Translation output
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
INHERENT JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2022
(Arising out of Diary No. 4058 of 2022)
IN
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL)NO.11094 OF 2019
P. CHANDRIKA …Appellant
VERSUS
THE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONER OF URBAN
LAND CEILING AND URBAN LAND TAX AND ANR. …Respondents
Delay in preferring Review Petition is condoned.
Application for listing Review Petition in open Court is rejected.
In proceedings initiated under the Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1978 the possession of excess urban land was taken over well before the Repeal Act came into force. In the premises, the Writ Petition filed by the present Review Petitioner was found to be without any substance and the claim was rejected by the Division
Bench. The Special Leave Petition arising therefrom
We have gone through the Review Petition and the grounds raised in support thereof. We do not find any error apparent on record to justify interference.
This Review Petition is, therefore, dismissed.
………………………………J.
[Uday Umesh Lalit]
[S. Ravindra Bhat]
[Hrishikesh Roy]
New Delhi;
March 15, 2022.
JUDGMENT