Full Text
Translation output
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
INHERENT JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO.1907 OF 2017
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO.2711 OF 2010
N. SRINIVASA RAO Petitioner
CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO.1907 OF 2017
IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO.2711 OF 2010
N. SRINIVASA RAO Petitioner
VERSUS
SMT. RANJEEV R. ACHARYA & ANR. Respondents
WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO.1911-1912 OF 2017
IN
CIVIL APPEAL Nos.2712-2713 OF 2010
GOVINDRAJ & ORS. ETC. Petitioners
IN
CIVIL APPEAL Nos.2712-2713 OF 2010
GOVINDRAJ & ORS. ETC. Petitioners
VERSUS
SMT. RANJEEV R. ACHARYA & ORS. ETC. Respondents
Heard Ms. Anjani Aiyagari, learned counsel in support of the contempt petitions; and Mr. P.V. Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the alleged contemnors.
We see no reason to entertain these contempt petitions any longer.
The notice issued to the alleged contemnors is discharged.
Heard Ms. Anjani Aiyagari, learned counsel in support of the contempt petitions; and Mr. P.V. Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the alleged contemnors.
We see no reason to entertain these contempt petitions any longer.
The notice issued to the alleged contemnors is discharged.
The contempt petitions are, accordingly, closed. ............................CJI.
[UDAY UMESH LALIT] ..............................J.
[S. RAVINDRA BHAT]
NEW DELHI;
SEPTEMBER 05, 2022
[UDAY UMESH LALIT] ..............................J.
[S. RAVINDRA BHAT]
NEW DELHI;
SEPTEMBER 05, 2022
JUDGMENT