CROCS INC.USA v. AQUALLITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR.

Delhi High Court · 09 Oct 2023 · 2023:DHC:7408
C. Hari Shankar
CS(COMM) 52/2018
2023:DHC:7408
intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for infringement of a footwear design following cancellation of the design registration for lack of novelty, reserving liberty to the plaintiff to pursue remedies if the appeal against cancellation succeeds.

Full Text
Translation output
CS(COMM) 52/2018
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CS(COMM) 52/2018, I.A. 19320/2022 & I.A. 6416/2023
CROCS INC.USA ..... Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv.
VERSUS
AQUALLITE INDIA LIMITED AND ANR. ..... Defendants
Through: Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, Mr. Ishith Arora and Ms. Simranjot Kaur, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR O R D E R (O R A L)
09.10.2023
JUDGMENT

1. The plaintiff, in this suit, alleged infringement, by the defendants, of the design of the plaintiff’s footwear, which is referred to, in the suit, as the “CROCS DESIGN”, in respect of which the plaintiff held design registration no. 197685 dated 28 May 2004. The life of the design expired by afflux of time on 28 May 2019.

2. Two weeks prior thereto, on 9 May 2019, an order was passed by the Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs cancelling the registration of the plaintiff’s design on the ground of lack of novelty and prior publication.

3. It is stated that an appeal has been preferred against the said order but no orders have been passed thereon.

4. Learned Counsel for the plaintiff has invited my attention to an order dated 12 July 2023 passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in CS(COMM) 625/2018 in respect of the plaintiff itself, albeit against M/s Bata India Ltd.

5. In similar circumstances, the Coordinate Bench held that, in view of the cancellation of the design on the ground of lack of novelty and prior publication, the suit could not survive but left open the remedies, if any, available to the plaintiff in the event of the appeal against the order of cancellation being allowed.

6. Reserving liberty with the present plaintiff in the same terms, this suit is disposed of with all pending applications.

7. Needless to say, there is no question of recording of any evidence in this matter any further.

C.HARI SHANKAR, J OCTOBER 9, 2023