Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board v. Samhlo and Anr

Delhi High Court · 10 Oct 2023 · 2023:DHC:7406
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
CM(M) 1450/2023
2023:DHC:7406
civil petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition directing withdrawal of attachments against the petitioner upon deposit of the ordered amount, while allowing verification of additional claimed sums.

Full Text
Translation output
CM(M) 1450/2023
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CM(M) 1450/2023 & CM APPL. 46245/2023
Date of Decision: 10.10.2023 DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT
BOARD ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Parvinder Chauhan and Ms. Akriti Garg, Advocates with Mr. Vijay Maggo (Law Officer) and Mr. Pranav Sinha, LA for DUSIB
VERSUS
SAMHLO (WRONGLY WRITTEN AS SHAMLI) AND ANR ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. V.S. Rana, Advocate for R-1 Mr. Sanjay Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K.K. Kiran Pathak, Advocate for R-2, UOI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
JUDGMENT
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J (ORAL):

1. Learned standingcounselfor thePetitioner, Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, states that an amount of Rs. 1,25,51,466/- as recorded in the order dated 06.09.2023 stands deposited with the Executing Court.

2. In reply, learned counselfor theRespondentNo.1, land owner, states that thereis a deficiency of an amountof Rs. 4 lakhs approximately, which CM(M) 1450/2023 has to be deposited in addition to thesum ofRs. 1,25,51,466/-which already stands deposited. He states that he has already highlighted the said fact before the Executing Court by filing the computation in this regard.

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that they will abide by the final adjudicationofany further amount, which is payableto theRespondent No.1 in pursuanceto theaward. Thesaid statement is taken on record andhe is bound down to the same.

3.1. He states that however,hereserves his right to verify thecomputation submitted by Respondent No.1. The said right is reserved.

4. Learned counsel for the Respondent No.1 states that in view of the order dated 06.09.2023, Respondent No.1 had not taken any steps for execution ofthe warrantsofattachmentissued by the Executing Court vide order dated 17.08.2023.

5. In view of the aforesaid statement of Respondent No. 1 and complianceby the Petitioner, it is clarified that if any attachment has been affected against the Petitioner, the same will be withdrawn forthwith.

6. Accordingly, with theaforesaiddirection this petition is disposed of. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.