Col Sanjeev Thakur v. Union of India and Others

Delhi High Court · 20 Oct 2023 · 2023:DHC:7779-DB
Sanjeev Sachdeva; Manoj Jain
W.P.(C) 14007/2023
2023:DHC:7779-DB
administrative petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to comply with military proceedings while preserving his right to raise defenses and ordered deferment of arrest warrants pending his appearance.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 14007/2023
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 20th October, 2023
W.P.(C) 14007/2023 & CM APPL. 55374/2023
COL SANJEEV THAKUR ..... Petitioner
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Sumit Sinha, Mr. Sumit Sinha & Ms. Pooja Singh, Advocates
For the Respondents: Mr. Neeraj, Senior Penal Counsel with Mr. Vedansh Anand, Mr. Sahaj & Mr. Rudra Paliwal, Advocates
Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate for R-7 Major Deepak Ranva, M.S. (Legal), Major Tarun V. Pillai, M.S. (Legal) & Major Partho Katyayan (Army)
CORAM:-
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
JUDGMENT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1. Petitioner impugns, inter alia, order dated 04.07.2023 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench whereby the original application of the petitioner has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that after passing of the order by the Tribunal, arrest warrants have been issued for securing the presence of the petitioner. He submits that petitioner has never refused to join any proceedings and is willing to join the proceedings subject to his right to take an appropriate defence with regard to procedural or other lapses on part of the respondents in conduct of the Court of Inquiry or further proceedings emanating there from.

3. Learned counsel for respondent, per contra, submits that request for arrest of petitioner was issued since petitioner had failed to respond to two summons that were issued requiring him to join further proceedings. He submits that Court of Inquiry has already concluded and petitioner had participated in the said proceedings and further proceedings have to be commenced thereafter.

4. Learned counsel for petitioner undertakes that petitioner shall report to the N-Area, Chandigarh on 30.10.2023 at 11.00 AM.

5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of directing the petitioner to report to N-Area, Chandigarh on 30.10.2023 at 11.00 AM to participate in further proceedings being conducted by the respondents. It is further directed that respondents shall hold further proceedings strictly in accordance with the Army Act, Army Rules and Regulations framed there under.

6. It would be open to the petitioner to take such defences and objections as may be available in law. Further, respondents are directed to intimate the concerned Commissioner of Police and District Magistrate to defer the arrest of petitioner till 30.10.2023

11.00 AM and in case petitioner fails to report as undertaken, the Police Commissioner and the concerned Magistrate as well as the respondents would be at liberty to take further coercive action as may be warranted in facts and circumstances.

7. Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

8. Order dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

1. MANOJ JAIN, J OCTOBER 20, 2023