Rajkumar Pravinkumar Mehta v. The Apex Grievance Redressal Committee & Others

High Court of Bombay · 19 Jan 2026
Firdosh P. Pooniwalla
Writ Petition No.2985 of 2025
administrative appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the allocation of rehabilitation accommodation, holding that the petitioner must seek remedy through appropriate legal channels without court interference.

Full Text
Translation output
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2985 OF 2025
Rajkumar Pravinkumar Mehta .. Petitioner
VERSUS
The Apex Grievance Redressal Committee
& Others .. Respondents.
Mr.Janay Jain a/w Mr. Ashwin S. Tripathi, Advocate for the Petitioner
Ms. Aparna D. Vhatkar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1-AGRC
Ms.Ravleen Sabharwal a/w Ms. Aarushi Yadav and Mr. Prakhar
Tandon, Advocate for the Resondent Nos. 2 & 3-SRA
Mr.Shashikant Surana a/w Mr. Madhur Surana, Advocate for the
Respondent No. 4
CORAM: FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.
DATE: JANUARY 19, 2026
P.C.
For the reasons stated in the Judgement dated 19th January 2026, passed in Writ Petition No. 2892 of 2025, the following Orders are passed :-
(i) The Writ Petition is dismissed. The Rule is discharged;
(ii) As far as the grievance of the Petitioner about the allocation of the permanent alternate accommodation to be allotted to him in the Rehabilitation Building is concerned, he is at liberty to seek such remedy as may be permissible to him in law. If any such Application is made, it will be decided on its own merits without being influenced by the present Order;
(iii) In the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order at to costs.
[FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.]
JUDGMENT