Ram Beti v. The State

Delhi High Court · 19 Jan 2024 · 2024:DHC:416-DB

Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain

W.P.(CRL) 3515/2023

2024:DHC:416-DB

criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition concerning a missing person complaint as the matter was already registered in the appropriate jurisdiction and advised the petitioner to seek remedy before the competent authority.

Full Text

W.P.(CRL) 3515/2023
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(CRL) 3515/2023 Date of decision: 19.01.2024
SMT. RAM BETI ..... Petitioner
Through: None.

VERSUS

THE STATE & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel

WITH

Ms. Priyam Agarwal and Mr. Ahinav Kr. Arya, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

JUDGMENT

(oral)

1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner.

2. The respondent/state has filed status report, mentioning therein that on the same date, the missing complaint was transferred to the concerned police station through CCTNS vide GD No. 76A dated 26.09.2023, PS Shaheen Bagh.

3. Such missing complaint of Mahesh Chand has already been registered at PS Kuchaman City, Rajasthan. The copy of the missing complaint registered at PS Kuchaman City, Rajasthan is also annexed as Annexure D with status report.

4. Clearly, said Sh. Mahesh Chand has gone missing from the jurisdiction of said police station, and, therefore, no order is required to be passed in the present petition.

5. The Petitioner is always at liberty to pursue her remedy before Competent Court/Authority.

6. The petition is disposed of accordingly.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE (MANOJ JAIN)

JUDGE JANUARY 19, 2024

Ram Beti v. The State

AI Summary

Full Text

JUDGMENT

Contact Us for a Free Consultation