Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: February 12, 2024
JUDGMENT
1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “In view of the facts and circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: W.P.(C) 1973/2024 Page 2 (a) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent No. 2 to grant employment to the petitioner for the post of fitter instructor (practical) under Govt. of Haryana, he is selected for. (b) Issue a Writ of Mandamus or any direction to the Respondent No. 5 to issue a letter as needed by the Employer (Respondent No. 2) that "the petitioner is eligible for the post of fitter" in line with the letter dated 30.01.2023 and 29.03.2023 issued by Respondents No. 3 & 4 respectively.
(c) Pass any other order/s or directions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in facts and circumstance of case and in the interest of justice.
2. The petitioner had initially approached the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, by filing an Original Application being OA No. 4063/2023, which has closed the OA by stating in paragraph 5 and 6 as under:
3. There is no dispute that the prayer made in the petition is for issuance of writ of mandamus against the respondent No.2, Skill Development and Industrial Training Department, Panchkula, Haryana, under the Government W.P.(C) 1973/2024 Page 3 of Haryana, Panchkula, Haryana.
4. In so far as respondent No.5 is concerned, petitioner is seeking a direction against the Naval Authority to issue a certificate that petitioner is eligible for post of Fitter.
5. Our attention has been drawn to page 158 of the paperbook, which is a communication issued by the Integrated Headquarters, MoD (Navy), New Delhi, wherein the respondent No.5 has stated the petitioner is eligible for the post of ITI (Fitter). Similar is the communication dated January 30, 2023, by the Director General of Resettlement, West Block-IV.
6. The Naval Authority having given the certificate, it is for the petitioner to make a request for grant of employment in the manner he has done in prayer (a) of the writ petition to the respondent No.2 and it is for the said respondent No.2 to consider and decide the same.
7. So it follows, the grievance of the petitioner primarily lies against respondent No.2, i.e., Skill Development and Industrial Training Department, Govt. of Haryana.
8. This petition is closed as dismissed, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent Court of jurisdiction for the relief at serial no.(a) of the prayer clause against the respondent no.2. No cost.
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
SAURABH BANERJEE, J FEBRUARY 12, 2024