Baby Ashwika v. Maxfort School & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 24 Apr 2024 · 2024:DHC:3509
C. Hari Shankar
W.P.(C) 13340/2023
2024:DHC:3509
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition after the respondent school admitted the petitioner as a Disadvantaged Group student with all entitled facilities, treating the admission as regular and permanent.

Full Text
Translation output
WP(C) 13340/2023
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 13340/2023
BABY ASHWIKA ..... Petitioner
Through: None
VERSUS
MAXFORT SCHOOL & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Attendance slip not given for Respondent 1
Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Adv. for Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Standing Counsel (Civil) for DoE
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
ORDER (ORAL)
24.04.2024
W.P.(C) 13340/2023
JUDGMENT

1. There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned Counsel, who appears for the Respondent 1-school submits that the school has granted admission to the petitioner in accordance with the allotment done by the DoE. She further submits that the respondent school is ready to educate the petitioner as a Disadvantaged Group (DG) category student and provide her all the facilities to which such students would be entitled. She also submits that the admission would be treated as regular and permanent in nature. WP(C) 13340/2023

2. The grievance in this writ petition thus stands assuaged.

3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

4. This Court sincerely appreciates the proactive attempt taken by the respondent school.