Rajan Kashyap v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 06 May 2024 · 2024:DHC:3659
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
CRL. M.C. 3603/2024
2024:DHC:3659
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL. M.C. 3603/2024
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 06.05.2024
CRL. M.C. 3603/2024
RAJAN KASHYAP ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate
WITH
Petitioner-in-person.
VERSUS
STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP
WITH
Mr. Chaaitanya Jain and Mr. Shishav Shukla, Advocates
WITH
SI Kavish
Rana, PS: Laxmi Nagar.
Mr. Amit Kumar and Mr. Mohd.
Suhail, Advocates for R-2
WITH
R-2 in-person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
JUDGMENT
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL)
CRL.M.A. 13830/2024
Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 3603/2024

1. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for quashing of FIR No. 0239/2017, under Sections 498A/34 IPC, registered at P.S.: Shakarpur (East) and proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. Issue notice. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 along with respondent No. 2 in person appear on advance notice and accept notice.

3. In brief, as per the case of the petitioners, marriage between petitioner and respondent No. 2 was solemnized according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on 21.02.2007. Two female children were born out of the wedlock, who are presently in custody of respondent No. 2. Due to temperamental differences, petitioner and respondent No. 2 started living separately. On complaint of respondent No. 2, present FIR was registered on 01.06.2017.

4. The disputes have been amicably resolved between the parties vide settlement deed dated 20.10.2023. The marriage between petitioner and respondent No. 2 has been dissolved by decree of divorce by way of mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act vide judgment dated 30.03.2024.

5. Learned APP for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement between the parties, the State has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

6. Petitioner as well as respondent No. 2 are present in person and have been identified by SI Kavish Rana, PS: Laxmi Nagar. Co-accused / family members of the petitioner are stated to have been discharged vide order dated 24.11.2021. I have interacted with the parties and they confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any threat, pressure or coercion. Respondent No. 2 also states that nothing remains to be further adjudicated upon between the parties and he has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the case pending. It would be nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. Consequently, FIR No. 0239/2017, under Sections 498A/34 IPC, registered at P.S.: Shakarpur (East) and proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed. Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. A copy of this order be forwarded to learned Trial Court for information.

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J. MAY 06, 2024