! Through: Ms. Rashmi B. Singh, Advocate v. $ RAJENDER PRASHAD & OTHERS

Delhi High Court · 21 Jul 2009 · 2009:DHC:2808
Hon'ble MR. JUSTICE S.N. AGGARWAL
2009:DHC:2808

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) No. 13438/2006
Date of Decision: 21st July, 2009 # RAKBRO INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION..... PETITIONER
! Through: Ms. Rashmi B. Singh, Advocate.
VERSUS
$ RAJENDER PRASHAD & OTHERS.....RESPONDENTS ^ Through: Mr. Rama Shankar, Advocate.
CORAM:
Hon'ble MR. JUSTICE S.N. AGGARWAL
JUDGMENT

1. Whether reporters of Local paper may be allowed to see the judgment? NO

2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? NO S.N.AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) Counsel for both the parties jointly submit that this matter has been compromised between the parties and in terms of their compromise, they have agreed that whatever amount was deposited by the petitioner with the Registrar General pursuant to the Court order dated 28.08.2006 be released in favour of the workman (respondent NO. 1 herein) in full and final settlement of all his claims arising out of the impugned award.

2. It is submitted that the petitioner had deposited an amount of Rs. 95,908/- including litigation expenses of Rs. 7,500/- with the Court pursuant to the Court order dated 28.08.2006. Respondent No. 1 is stated to have already withdrawn an amount of Rs. 7,500/- allowed as litigation expenses and the only deposit that is lying with the Registry is 2009:DHC:2808 stated to be Rs. 88,408/-.

3. Ms. Rashmi B. Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instructions from her client, says that this amount of Rs. 88,408/- deposited by the petitioner pursuant to the Court order dated 28.08.2006 may be released in favour of respondent No. 1 towards final settlement of all his claims arising out of the impugned award.

4. Ms. Rama Shankar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 1, on instructions from his client present in the Court, accepts the offer given to him by the counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

5. In view of the above and having regard to the submissions made by the counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of as compromised between the parties.

6. The Registry is directed to release the amount of Rs. 88,408/- along with interest accrued thereon in favour of respondent No. 1 forthwith.

7. All pending miscellaneous applications also stand disposed of. JULY 21, 2009 S.N.AGGARWAL, J 'bsr'