Danish Ahmed v. Jamia Millia Islamia University

1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? YES

2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

NO ANIL KUMAR, J. * An additional affidavit dated 11th August, 2009 of Sh.M.H.Khan, is taken on record. The deponent has deposed that the respondent University has considered the request of the petitioner for admission pursuant to the apologies tendered and the remorse shown by the petitioner for his conduct to the Proctor on 28th July, 2009. The respondent has contended that the petitioner shall not be debarred for admission in the respondent University for the next academic session 2010, however, the conduct of the petitioner shall be under close scrutiny and that petitioner shall abide by all 2009:DHC:3216 W.P(C) No.6969/2009 rules/regulations and shall conduct himself with discipline and decorum. The Registrar has also deposed that the marks scored by the petitioner in the written admission test for B.E (Civil Engineering) course for the academic session, 2009 shall remain the same but the petitioner shall be required to face the interview board in 2010. The marks scored by the petitioner in the interview shall be added to the marks already scored by him in the written examination and on the basis of merit only the petitioner will be considered for admission to the course in 2010. A copy of the short affidavit of the Registrar has been given to the counsel for the petitioner in presence of the petitioner who has read the same. The petitioner accepts the conditions imposed by the University. Consequently, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the deposition of the Registrar of the respondent University made in affidavit dated 11th August, 2009. Parties are also allowed to bear their own cost. August 12, 2009 ANIL KUMAR, J. ‘k’