Irshad Ali @ Deepak v. The State

Delhi High Court · 28 Aug 2009 · 2009:DHC:3526
Mool Chand Garg
Crl.Rev.P. 107/2009
2009:DHC:3526
criminal other Procedural

AI Summary

The High Court of Delhi issued procedural directions on the reporting and publication of its judgment in a criminal revision petition without addressing substantive issues.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Crl.Rev.P. 107/2009
Date of reserve: 11.08.2009
Date of Decision: 28.08.2009
IRSHAD ALI @ DEEPAK …PETITIONER
Through: Mr. M. Sufian Siddiqui, adv.
VERSUS
THE STATE ...RESPONDENT
Through: Mr. G.E. Vahanvati, Attorney General of India.
Ms. Mukta Gupta, Sr. Standing Counsel for State
Mr. Harish Gulati, Adv. for CBI
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOOL CHAND GARG
JUDGMENT

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to Reporter or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?: MOOL CHAND GARG, J. For orders see Crl.M.C.781/2009 MOOL CHAND GARG, J. AUGUST 28, 2009 ag