Full Text
Translation output
39 ^ HIGH COURT OF DELHI I.A.-12057/2009 in OS(OS)1219/2009
AUTODESK,INC & ANR Plaintiff
Through: Ms.Aarshia Behl, Advocate.
AUTODESK,INC & ANR Plaintiff
Through: Ms.Aarshia Behl, Advocate.
VERSUS
MR. R.P. SHAH & ORS. Defendants
Through: Mr. Chander Shekhar Patney,Advocate.
Through: Mr. Chander Shekhar Patney,Advocate.
CORAM:
■# HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE 3. RAVINDRA BHAT
16.09.2009 I.A.-12057/2009 (0-23. R-3)
This is a joint application requesting the Court to record compromise whereby inter se disputes between the plaintiffs and defendants stand settled.
The Application is supported by the affidavit of the plaintiffs' authorized representative and the first defendant. Defendant No.2 has also filed an affidavit fv through its authorized representative Mr. Himanshu Patil, its Director. He has filed in addition an authority letter and resolutions on behalf of the other defendants.
Having considered the materials and submissions on record, the Court is of opinion that interest of justice requires that the relief sought in the application should be granted. I.A.-12057/2009 is accordingly allowed.
CS (OS) 1219/2009
In view of the order made in I.A.-12057/2009, the Suit has to decree in terms of paragraph-2 (a) to 2 (k) of the Application.
2009:DHC:6098 Let a decree in these terms be drawn subject to the plaintiff depositing thd-
Court fee constituting the difference of what was paid and what is remaining since an amount of Rs.74,40,000/- has been claimed, within two weeks.
Let a decree be drawn in the above terms.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT,J SEPTEMBER 16,2009 /vd/ \ 2009:DHC:6098
16.09.2009 I.A.-12057/2009 (0-23. R-3)
This is a joint application requesting the Court to record compromise whereby inter se disputes between the plaintiffs and defendants stand settled.
The Application is supported by the affidavit of the plaintiffs' authorized representative and the first defendant. Defendant No.2 has also filed an affidavit fv through its authorized representative Mr. Himanshu Patil, its Director. He has filed in addition an authority letter and resolutions on behalf of the other defendants.
Having considered the materials and submissions on record, the Court is of opinion that interest of justice requires that the relief sought in the application should be granted. I.A.-12057/2009 is accordingly allowed.
CS (OS) 1219/2009
In view of the order made in I.A.-12057/2009, the Suit has to decree in terms of paragraph-2 (a) to 2 (k) of the Application.
2009:DHC:6098 Let a decree in these terms be drawn subject to the plaintiff depositing thd-
Court fee constituting the difference of what was paid and what is remaining since an amount of Rs.74,40,000/- has been claimed, within two weeks.
Let a decree be drawn in the above terms.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT,J SEPTEMBER 16,2009 /vd/ \ 2009:DHC:6098
JUDGMENT