Mohan Singh v. Panna Lal

Delhi High Court · 17 Sep 2009 · 2009:DHC:8875
Vipin Sanghi
CM(M) 329/2007
2009:DHC:8875
civil petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court held that interim observations on title in interlocutory proceedings do not bar a party from pursuing a substantive suit on the property.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CM(M) 329/2007 & C.M. Nos. 341 2-341 3/2007
MOHAN SINGH Petitioner
Through: Mr. J. C., Mahendroo, Advocate.
VERSUS
PANNA LAL Respondent
Through: Mr. H.S. Gautam, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
17.09.2009 After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this petition. He, however, submits that while disposing off the application under
Order 39 Rule 2A, and the appeal the Courts below have made certain observations with regard to the title of the petitioner to the suit property. It is made clear that any observation made by the Courts below in these proceedings, with regard to the title of the petitioner, shall not come in the way of the petitioner in perusing the suit filed by the petitioner against the respondent in respect of the suit property.
With these observations petition stands disposed of. All pending applications also stand disposed of.
4r, VIPIN SANGHI, J.
SEPTEMBER 17, 2009 vn 2009:DHC:8875
JUDGMENT