OYO WORKSPACES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. OPTIMUM OVERSEAS CONSULTING SERVICES

Delhi High Court · 24 May 2024 · 2024:DHC:4447
Neena Bansal Krishna
ARB.P.547/2024
2024:DHC:4447
civil petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from unpaid dues under a commercial membership agreement.

Full Text
Translation output
ARB.P.547/2024
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 24thMay, 2024
ARB.P. 547/2024
OYO WORKSPACES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Diptiman Accharya and Ms. Shreya Srivastava, Advocates.
VERSUS
OPTIMUM OVERSEAS CONSULTING SERVICES ..... Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
JUDGMENT
(oral)

1. The present Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act, 1996”) has been filed on behalf of the petitioners seeking appointment of an independent Arbitrator.

2. Briefly stated, the petitioner provides workplace solutions designed to meet the needs of corporate starting from budget to premium category. The respondent a private limited Company approached the petitioner to avail their services. The petitioner entered into a Membership Agreement dated 28.02.2023 with the respondent for their commercial location at Madarpur, Telangana. As per the said Agreement, the respondent was permitted to occupy 19 seats in the said property from 01.12.2022 to 01.03.2025 for a Digitally monthly membership fees of Rs.1,49,454/-. It was agreed between the parties that in case of any dispute, the same shall be resolved by mutual discussion, negotiation and subsequently by arbitrations. The respondent has not cleared the dues for the usage of the property and the total unpaid dues are in the sum of Rs.1,79,217/- along with applicable TDS. Aggrieved by the actions of the respondent, the petitioner sent a Notice dated 17.02.2024 Invoking Arbitration to the respondent through email. The respondent sent a reply dated 25.02.2024 to the said Notice of the petitioner and denied the legitimate dues of the petitioner and made vague averments regarding the same. Further the respondent did not consent to the appointment of the Arbitrator as proposed by the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner filed the present petition for appointment of the Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes with the respondent.

3. The respondent has been duly served through email, despite which none has appeared on behalf of the respondent.

4. Submissions heard.

5. Considering that the disputes have arisen due to recovery of Rs.1,79,217/- along with applicable TDS, the disputes are amenable to be settled through arbitration.

6. The petition is referred to the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) which shall appoint an Arbitrator from the panel for adjudication of disputes.

7. The appointment of the Arbitrator shall be governed by the rules framed by the DIAC including the fees and the disclosure to be made by the learned Arbitrator in conformity of Section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Digitally

8. The petition is disposed.

9. Let a copy of this order be sent to the Co-ordinator, DIAC.

JUDGE MAY 24, 2024 va Digitally