Full Text
Translation output
% 06.11.2009
Present: Ms Aarshia Behl, Advocate for the Plaintiff.
Mr Rajesh Gogna & Mr Sanjay ]ha, Advocates for respondent nos. 1-3/contemnor.
+ IA No. (to be numbered)/2009 (0. 23 R. 3) in CS (OS) 1060/2008
The registry is directed to number the captioned application.
This is an application filed under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section
151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short the 'CPC'), by both the plaintiffs and the defendants. To be noted that learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that she wishes to delete defendant nos. 1 &
3 from the array of parties. It is ordered accordingly.
The terms of the compromise, arrived at between the plaintiffs and the remaining defendant, i.e., defendant no. 2 (now the defendant), are contained in the captioned application. The terms of the compromise are recorded in paragraph 2 (a) to (i) of the application. The defendant, amongst other obligations has agreed to pay a sum of Rs 7 lacs to plaintiff no. 1 towards legal cost. The learned counsel for the plaintiff affirms the said position. It is also agreed in terms of Paragraph 2(e) of the application that the contempt petition shall be withdrawn by the plaintiffs.
I have perused the terms of compromise. The same are lawful.
CS (OS) 1060/2008
2009:DHC:6140
.~'
The suit be decreed in terms of the compromise. A decree sheet be I] prepared accordingly. The captioned application shall form part of the decree. The suit is disposed of.
CCP(O) 218/2008
In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, as indicated above, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the same. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the orders passed in IA No. (to be numbered)/2009
(0. 23 R. 3) the suit is disposed of.
NOVEMBER 06, 2009 kk
(6j...l~ -
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
Present: Ms Aarshia Behl, Advocate for the Plaintiff.
Mr Rajesh Gogna & Mr Sanjay ]ha, Advocates for respondent nos. 1-3/contemnor.
+ IA No. (to be numbered)/2009 (0. 23 R. 3) in CS (OS) 1060/2008
The registry is directed to number the captioned application.
This is an application filed under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section
151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short the 'CPC'), by both the plaintiffs and the defendants. To be noted that learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that she wishes to delete defendant nos. 1 &
3 from the array of parties. It is ordered accordingly.
The terms of the compromise, arrived at between the plaintiffs and the remaining defendant, i.e., defendant no. 2 (now the defendant), are contained in the captioned application. The terms of the compromise are recorded in paragraph 2 (a) to (i) of the application. The defendant, amongst other obligations has agreed to pay a sum of Rs 7 lacs to plaintiff no. 1 towards legal cost. The learned counsel for the plaintiff affirms the said position. It is also agreed in terms of Paragraph 2(e) of the application that the contempt petition shall be withdrawn by the plaintiffs.
I have perused the terms of compromise. The same are lawful.
CS (OS) 1060/2008
2009:DHC:6140
.~'
The suit be decreed in terms of the compromise. A decree sheet be I] prepared accordingly. The captioned application shall form part of the decree. The suit is disposed of.
CCP(O) 218/2008
In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, as indicated above, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the same. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the orders passed in IA No. (to be numbered)/2009
(0. 23 R. 3) the suit is disposed of.
NOVEMBER 06, 2009 kk
(6j...l~ -
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
2009:DHC:6140
JUDGMENT