Lalita Devi v. Union of India

Delhi High Court · 30 May 2024 · 2024:DHC:4701
Sachin Datta
W.P.(C) 7824/2024
2024:DHC:4701
administrative appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging Clause 11 of the Railway Board's Catering Policy 2017, directing petitioners to vacate premises as per an earlier judgment.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 30.05.2024
W.P.(C) 7824/2024, CM APPL. 32406/2024 - STAY
JUDGMENT

(115) LALITA DEVI..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitender Mehta, Adv. along with Mr. Lalit Kumar, Adv.

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS...... Respondents Through: Ms. Manisha Agrawal Narain, CGSC along with Mr. Sandeep Singh Somaria, Ms. Khushi Mangla, Ms. Neha, GP and Ms. Karnika Bahugana, Advs. for respondents. + W.P.(C) 8004/2024, CM APPL. 32959/2024 - STAY (116) SUSHMA GUPTA..... Petitioner versus Through: Mr. Nishant Gautam,CGSC along with Ms. Sanjana Mehrotra, Mr. Mayank Sharma and Mr. Vinay Kauhik, Advs. for UOI. + W.P.(C) 3954/2024, CM APPL. 16237/2024 - STAY (119) HANI KHATOON..... Petitioner versus Through: Mr. Nirvakar Verma, SPC alongwith Mr. Bharat Singh, GP, Advs. for respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA

1. The present petitionshave been filed by the petitioners impugning Clause 11 of the Commercial Circular No.20 of 2017 (“Catering Policy 2017”) dated 27.02.2017, issued by the Railway Board.

SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL)

2. Considering that a batch of petitions seeking identical prayer/s has been dismissed by this court vide judgement dated 30.05.2024 in W.P.(C) 6771/2024 and connected matters, the present petitions are also disposed of in terms of the said judgement. The petitioners shall vacate the catering units in question within the same time period, as granted to the petitioners in the aforesaid batch matters.

SACHIN DATTA, J MAY 30, 2024