Pradeep Kumar v. Nikhil @ Rahul

Delhi High Court · 27 Nov 2009 · 2009:DHC:5028-DB
Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Ajit Bharihoke
Crl. REV. P. No.499 of 2007
Crl. REV. P. No.499 of 2007
other Procedural

AI Summary

The judgment text does not contain substantive legal reasoning or decision on the merits, but only procedural notes regarding reporting and publication.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Reserved on: 09.11.2009
Date of Decision: 27.11.2009 Crl. REV. P. No.499 of 2007
PRADEEP KUMAR …PETITIONER/
REVISIONIST
Through: Mr. Ajay Veer Singh Jain, Adv.
VERSUS
NIKHIL @ RAHUL …RESPONDENT
Through: Mr. Ramesh Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Bharat Sharma &
Mr. Sumit Arora, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BHARIHOKE
JUDGMENT

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to Reporter or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.

1. For orders see Crl. A. No.503/2009.

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. NOVEMBER 27, 2009 AJIT BHARIHOKE, J. b'nesh