197373db1562094cad7b10e950ef8bc602d08b88213fbf0e2c80409c9c887a0f

Delhi High Court · 23 Dec 2009 · 2009:DHC:13739-DB
Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Ajit Bharihoke
Cont. Cas. (Crl.) No. 25/2009
2009:DHC:13739-DB
criminal petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Court dismissed a petition for criminal contempt due to lack of Standing Counsel's consent and held that non-compliance with orders does not necessarily amount to criminal contempt.

Full Text
Translation output
,. ...
% 23.12.2009
Present: None.
Crl.
M.A. No.l5017/2009
Allowed subject to just exceptions.
+Cont. Cas. {Crl.) No.25/2009 & Crl.
M.A. No.l5016/2009
The matter has been passed over once and called the second time. On both occasions none appears for the petitioner.
We have perused the petition. The consent has not been granted by the Standing Counsel for initiation of criminal contempt. We also find from the averments made in the petition that the allegation is of non-compliance of the orders of the Court and it is really not a case of criminal contempt.
Dismissed.
DECEMBER 23, 2009 b'nesh
~
SANJAY KISH~N KAUL, J.
AJIT BHARIHOKE, J.
2009:DHC:13739-DB
JUDGMENT