Full Text
Translation output
' . ~ e.
'~\
:.
42.
*
+ j liN THE HIGH COUJRT OJF ])ELm AT NEW ])ELH:U: .
W.P.(C) 126/2010
SANJAY PRASHAR .·.... Petitioner
Through Mr. Vishratn Mukerjee, Advocate.
'~\
:.
42.
*
+ j liN THE HIGH COUJRT OJF ])ELm AT NEW ])ELH:U: .
W.P.(C) 126/2010
SANJAY PRASHAR .·.... Petitioner
Through Mr. Vishratn Mukerjee, Advocate.
VERSUS
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS... Respondents
Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Advocate for responde~t No. 1.
Through Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Advocate for responde~t No. 1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V:U:JP:U:N SANGH:U:
OR])ER
:n.01.2010
Counsel for the petitioner, after some argum~nts, wishes to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to prefer ,such other remedy as may be available to the petitioner. In view of the nature of the disputes which involye disputed questions of fact, the writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to p:t;efer such other remedy as may be available to the petitioner.
JANUA'i'!v U, 2010.
VKR .;_--
VIJPIN SANGHI, J.
2010:DHC:15645
OR])ER
:n.01.2010
Counsel for the petitioner, after some argum~nts, wishes to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to prefer ,such other remedy as may be available to the petitioner. In view of the nature of the disputes which involye disputed questions of fact, the writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to p:t;efer such other remedy as may be available to the petitioner.
JANUA'i'!v U, 2010.
VKR .;_--
VIJPIN SANGHI, J.
2010:DHC:15645
JUDGMENT