Namgyal Institute for Research on Ladakhi Art and Culture v. Turner Morrison Ltd.

Delhi High Court · 15 Jan 2010 · 2010:DHC:225-DB
Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Veena Birbal
FAO (OS) No.45/2010
2010:DHC:225-DB
other other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court addressed procedural questions regarding the reporting and publication of the judgment without deciding on the substantive appeal.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 15.01.2010 FAO (OS) No.45/2010
NAMGYAL INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON LADAKHI ART AND CULTURE
AND ANR.
…APPELLANTS
Through: Dr.Shyamlha Pappu, Sr.Adv. with Mr.R.Krishnaamorthi, Mr.K.K.Singh and Mr.V.K.Dawar, Advocates
VERSUS
TURNER MORRISON LTD. ...RESPONDENT
Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv.with Mr.Lalit Gupta, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
JUDGMENT

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to Reporter or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.(ORAL) For orders, see FAO (OS) No.26/2010.

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. JANUARY 15, 2010 VEENA BIRBAL, J. dm