Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
LA.No.480/2010IN CS(OS)1623/2009 AUTODESK,INC.& ANR.
Tlifough: Mr.Anlcush Mahajan,Advocate.
PlaintifN
LA.No.480/2010IN CS(OS)1623/2009 AUTODESK,INC.& ANR.
Tlifough: Mr.Anlcush Mahajan,Advocate.
PlaintifN
VERSUS
MR.D.SWAROOP & ORS.
Through: Mr.Dayan Krishnan with Mr. Gautam Narayan,Advocates.
Defendants
Through: Mr.Dayan Krishnan with Mr. Gautam Narayan,Advocates.
Defendants
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT
18.01.2010 This joint application requests the Court to record the compromise amved at between the parties. The terms ofcompromise are embodied in paragraph 2(a)to 2(k).
The application is supported by the affidavit ofthe plaintiffs constituted attorney as well as the first defendant(who is present in the court) and Director of the third defendant company. Itis stated by learned counselthatthe third defendantis also a Division ofthe second defendant. The deponent on behalfofthe said two defendants happens to be the first defendant.
Having considered the terms, the Court is of the opinion that the parties have arrived at a lawful compromise;interest ofjustice requires that the application should be allowed;l.A.480/2010 is,therefore,allowed.
CS lOSl 1623/2009 In view ofthe order made in 1.A.-480/2010, Suit is decreed in terms ofparagraph
2(a)to 2(k)ofthe said application. ;
S.RAVINDRA BHAT,J JANUARY 18,2010 /vd/ 2010:DHC:10500
18.01.2010 This joint application requests the Court to record the compromise amved at between the parties. The terms ofcompromise are embodied in paragraph 2(a)to 2(k).
The application is supported by the affidavit ofthe plaintiffs constituted attorney as well as the first defendant(who is present in the court) and Director of the third defendant company. Itis stated by learned counselthatthe third defendantis also a Division ofthe second defendant. The deponent on behalfofthe said two defendants happens to be the first defendant.
Having considered the terms, the Court is of the opinion that the parties have arrived at a lawful compromise;interest ofjustice requires that the application should be allowed;l.A.480/2010 is,therefore,allowed.
CS lOSl 1623/2009 In view ofthe order made in 1.A.-480/2010, Suit is decreed in terms ofparagraph
2(a)to 2(k)ofthe said application. ;
S.RAVINDRA BHAT,J JANUARY 18,2010 /vd/ 2010:DHC:10500
JUDGMENT