Mahilal v. State

Delhi High Court · 26 Mar 2010 · 2010:DHC:9497-DB
Pradeep Nandrajog; Suresh Kait
CRL.APPEAL N0.669/2008
2010:DHC:9497-DB
criminal other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court in CRL.APPEAL No. 669/2008 reserved and pronounced a judgment addressing procedural questions on whether local reporters may access the judgment and its publication status.

Full Text
Translation output
\\· HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
Reserved on: 18th f\1/arch, 2010 judgment Pronounced on:26th f\1/arch, 2010
CRL.APPEAL N0.669/2008 MAHILAL 5/0 LATE HARINANDAN ..... Appellant
STATE
CORAM:
Through: Mr.Vikas Padora, Advocate with Ms.Rita Hingmang, Advocate. versus ..... Respondent
Through: Ms.Richa Kapoor, A.P.P.
HON.BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. For orders see Cri.Appeal No.l93/2008. March 26, 2010 dk Cri.Appeal No.193/2008 & 669/2008 ~~~ PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. ~ SURESH KAIT, J.