Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL. A. No. 688/2003
NAND LAL ……Appellant
Through: Mr. Satish Tamta and Ms. Rushi Kapur, Advs. for respondent No.2.
CRL. A. No. 688/2003
NAND LAL ……Appellant
Through: Mr. Satish Tamta and Ms. Rushi Kapur, Advs. for respondent No.2.
VERSUS
The STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent
Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State.
Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, APP for the State.
JUDGMENT
reserved on: 22nd January, 2010
Judgment delivered on: 28th January, 2010
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Not necessary
2. To be referred to Reporter or not? Not necessary
3. Whether the judgment should be Not necessary reported in the Digest? A.K. PATHAK, J. For orders see Crl. A. No. 687/2003. A.K. PATHAK, J January 28, 2010 ga