Paramount Communications Ltd. v. Union of India and Anr.

Delhi High Court · 03 Feb 2010 · 2010:DHC:633-DB
Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Veena Birbal
W.P.(C) 3134/1997
2010:DHC:633-DB
other other Procedural

AI Summary

The judgment concerns procedural questions about the reporting and publication of the court's decision in a writ petition involving Paramount Communications Ltd. and the Union of India.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: February 3rd , 2010
W.P.(C) 3134/1997
PARAMOUNT COMMUNICATIONS LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Divya Kesar, Mr. Manmohit Puri, Ms. Aradhana Kaura and Mr. Gaurav Dudeja, Advocates
-versus- UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondent
Through: Ms. Meera Bhatia, Advocate for UOI Mr. Yashobant Das, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Advocate for respondent no. 2/BSNL
CORAM:-
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest?

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J (ORAL) For orders, see W.P.(C) No.3062/1997.

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. VEENA BIRBAL, J. FEBRUARY 3, 2010 srb