Pawan & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 02 Jul 2024 · 2024:DHC:4897
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
W.P.(CRL) 1925/2024
2024:DHC:4897
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(CRL) 1925/2024
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 02.07.2024
W.P.(CRL) 1925/2024
PAWAN & ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Imtiyaz Hussain and Ms. Salma, Advocates
WITH
Petitioners-in-person.
VERSUS
STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC for State
WITH
ASI Nathulal, PS: Sangam Vihar.
Mr. T. S. Gehlot, Advocate for R-2
WITH
Respondent No. 2 in-person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
JUDGMENT
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL)
CRL.M.A. 18769/2024
Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.

1. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘Cr.P.C.’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioners for quashing of FIR No. 0521/2020, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at PS: Sangam Vihar and proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. Issue notice. Learned ASC for the State and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 along with respondent No. 2 appear on advance notice and accept notice

3. In brief, as per the case of the petitioners, marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 was solemnized according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on 10.02.2019. No child was born out of the wedlock. Due to temperamental differences, petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 started living separately. On complaint of respondent No. 2, present FIR was registered on 22.10.2020.

4. The disputes are stated to have been amicably settled between the parties in terms of Settlement Deed dated 20.10.2022. The marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 has been dissolved by decree of divorce by way of mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act vide judgment dated 24.01.2023.

5. Learned ASC for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement between the parties, he has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

6. Petitioners and respondent No. 2 are present in person and have been identified by ASI Nathulal, PS: Sangam Vihar. I have interacted with the parties and they confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any threat, pressure or coercion. Respondent No. 2 also states that nothing remains to be further adjudicated upon between the parties and she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the case pending. It would be nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. Consequently, FIR No. 0521/2020, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at PS: Sangam Vihar and proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed. Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. A copy of this order be forwarded to learned Trial Court for information.

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J. JULY 02, 2024