Full Text
Translation output
Cont Cas(C) 580/2008 C. Ramakrishna v. Prakashwati & Anr.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Reserve: February 01, 2009
Date of Order: February 08, 2010 Cont. Cas(C) 580/2008
08.02.2010 Sri C. Ramakrishna ...Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Reserve: February 01, 2009
Date of Order: February 08, 2010 Cont. Cas(C) 580/2008
08.02.2010 Sri C. Ramakrishna ...Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate
VERSUS
Prakashwati & Anr. ...Respondents
Through: Mr. P.K. Dhamija, Advocates for R-4 and 5.
Mr. Mahesh K. Chaudhary, Advocate for R-1 JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
Through: Mr. P.K. Dhamija, Advocates for R-4 and 5.
Mr. Mahesh K. Chaudhary, Advocate for R-1 JUSTICE SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
JUDGMENT
1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not?
3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest?
JUDGMENT
1. In view of my findings in CM (M) 829 of 2005 titled as C. Rama Krishnan & Anr. versus Oriental Bank of Commerce & Ors., the present contempt petition stands dismissed. No orders as to costs. February 08, 2010 SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA J. rd