Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pyare Lal & Ors.

1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may NO be allowed to see the Judgment?

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? NO

3. Whether the judgment should be NO reported in the Digest? JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The appellant has challenged the award of the learned Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.2,52,000/- has been awarded to claimants/respondents No.6 and 7. The appellant is the insurer of the offending vehicle and has been held liable to pay the compensation.

2. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the offending vehicle was driven by respondent No.5 at the time of the accident and respondent No.5 was not holding any driving licence at the time of the accident and, therefore, the appellant is entitled to recovery rights against respondents No.1 and 2. 2010:DHC:833

3. Respondent No.5 is the driver of the offending vehicle and he appeared in the witness box before the Claims Tribunal as R4W[3] and admitted that he was never holding any licence to drive any vehicle. R4W[3] further admitted that even at the time of appearing before the Claims Tribunal in the witness box, he was not holding any licence to drive any vehicle. In view of the aforesaid admission of respondent No.5, the appellant is entitled to recovery rights against respondents No.1 and 2. Respondent No.1 is the registered owner of the offending vehicle and respondent No.2 is the purchaser of the said vehicle and the appellant is entitled to recovery rights against both of them.

4. The appeal is allowed and the impugned award is modified to the extent that the appellant is granted recovery rights to recover the award amount from respondents No.1 and 2.

5. The statutory amount deposited by the appellant along with this appeal be refunded back to the appellant through counsel within four weeks.

6. Copy of this order be given ‘Dasti’ to learned counsel for the appellant under the signature of Court Master. J.R. MIDHA, J FEBRUARY 10, 2010 aj