Full Text
Translation output
Crl. Revision Petition No. 152 of 2005 Page 1
R-6 & 7 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
R-6 & 7 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
Reserved on: March 4, 2010
Judgment Pronounced on: March 12, 2010 Criminal Revision Petition No. 152 of 2005
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) …… Petitioner
Through: Mr. R.N. Vats, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State
Vs.
Rajnish Kumar Singhal & Others …….. Respondents
Through: Mr. D.C. Mathur, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya & Mr. Narinder Chaudhary, Advocates
& Criminal Revision Petition No. 300-303 of 2005
Trilok Chand Singhal & Others …… Petitioners
Through: Mr. D.C. Mathur, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya & Mr. Narinder Chaudhary, Advocates
Vs.
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi …….. Respondent
Through: Mr. R.N. Vats, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State
2010:DHC:1467 Crl. Revision Petition No. 152 of 2005 Page 2
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) …… Petitioner
Through: Mr. R.N. Vats, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State
Vs.
Rajnish Kumar Singhal & Others …….. Respondents
Through: Mr. D.C. Mathur, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya & Mr. Narinder Chaudhary, Advocates
& Criminal Revision Petition No. 300-303 of 2005
Trilok Chand Singhal & Others …… Petitioners
Through: Mr. D.C. Mathur, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya & Mr. Narinder Chaudhary, Advocates
Vs.
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi …….. Respondent
Through: Mr. R.N. Vats, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State
2010:DHC:1467 Crl. Revision Petition No. 152 of 2005 Page 2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to Reporter or not? No
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SUNIL GAUR, J.
1. For orders see Criminal Revision Petition No. 300-03 of
2005. Sunil Gaur, J. March 12, 2010 rs