Udit Singh v. State of Delhi and Others

Delhi High Court · 15 Mar 2010 · 2010:DHC:1516
Sanjiv Khanna
W.P.(C) 14219/2009
2010:DHC:1516
administrative petition_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner claiming tehbazari rights to approach the Zonal Vending Committee with supporting documents for consideration under the Supreme Court ruling and National Policy, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.

Full Text
Translation output
2.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
W.P.(C) 14219/2009
UDIT SINGH ..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Aeltemesh Rein, Ms.Shashravish Rein, advocates.
VERSUS
STATE OF DELHI AND OTHERS ..... Respondents
Through Ms. Sana Ansari, Advocate for Ms. Zubeda Begum, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 3.
Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel for respondent No. 2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA O R D E R 15.03.2010
Petitioner claims tehbazari rights. In terms of the decision of the Supreme
Court in Patri Vyapar Mandal Delhi
VERSUS
MCD, Town Hall, 2009 (12) SCC
475 and further orders and the National Policy of Urban Street Vendors, 2004, the petitioner will approach the Zonal Vending Committee along with the papers in support of his claim. The claim of the petitioner will be considered in terms of the
JUDGMENT
of the Supreme Court and the National Policy of Urban Street Vendors,

2004. Interim order granted by this Court will continue for one month to enable the petitioner to approach the Zonal Vending Committee. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.

SANJIV KHANNA, J. MARCH 15, 2010. P/VKR 2010:DHC:1516