Full Text
Translation output
\Y
% 16.3.2010
Present: Mr.Pravin Anand & Mr.Nishchal Anand, Advocate for the plaintiffs.
Mr.Prashant Gupta, Advocate for the defendants.
+ I.A.No.3323/2010 ( u/O 23 R. 3 r/w S.151 CPC) & CS(OS) No.1456/2009
This is a joint application filed by the parties duly supported by the affidavit of authorized representatives of the plaintiff as also of defendants no.2 to 6. Parties have settled their disputes. In terms of the aforestated compromise arrived at between the parties details of which are contained in the present application, parties are seeking deletion of defendant no. I from the array of the parties. Defendant no. I is accordingly deleted from the array of the parties. Suit of the plaintiff is accordingly decreed in terms of the prayers made in para no.53 of the plaint. The terms of the compromise will also form the part of the decree.
The defendants have paid damages to the tune of Rs.7.5 lacs to the plaintiff and this has been mentioned in para no.6 of the compromise application. The parties are also permitted to approach Reserve Bank of India for processing o their foreign remittance application. No order as to costs. Decree sheet be drawn. to record room.
JNDERMEET KA UR, J.
MARCH 16, 2010.
'nandan' I f'' (
2010:DHC:14898
., 0-1
% 08.04.2011
Present : None.
+C.S. (OS) No. 1456/2009
*
File taken up on the office note.
The suit of the plaintiff is decreed in termj of prayer (a) and
(e) of para 53 of the prayer clause of the plaint.~
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
APRIL 08, 2011
SS
2010:DHC:14898
Present: Mr.Pravin Anand & Mr.Nishchal Anand, Advocate for the plaintiffs.
Mr.Prashant Gupta, Advocate for the defendants.
+ I.A.No.3323/2010 ( u/O 23 R. 3 r/w S.151 CPC) & CS(OS) No.1456/2009
This is a joint application filed by the parties duly supported by the affidavit of authorized representatives of the plaintiff as also of defendants no.2 to 6. Parties have settled their disputes. In terms of the aforestated compromise arrived at between the parties details of which are contained in the present application, parties are seeking deletion of defendant no. I from the array of the parties. Defendant no. I is accordingly deleted from the array of the parties. Suit of the plaintiff is accordingly decreed in terms of the prayers made in para no.53 of the plaint. The terms of the compromise will also form the part of the decree.
The defendants have paid damages to the tune of Rs.7.5 lacs to the plaintiff and this has been mentioned in para no.6 of the compromise application. The parties are also permitted to approach Reserve Bank of India for processing o their foreign remittance application. No order as to costs. Decree sheet be drawn. to record room.
JNDERMEET KA UR, J.
MARCH 16, 2010.
'nandan' I f'' (
2010:DHC:14898
., 0-1
% 08.04.2011
Present : None.
+C.S. (OS) No. 1456/2009
*
File taken up on the office note.
The suit of the plaintiff is decreed in termj of prayer (a) and
(e) of para 53 of the prayer clause of the plaint.~
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
APRIL 08, 2011
SS
2010:DHC:14898
JUDGMENT