Full Text
•
$~
* IN THE .HIGH COURT OF DELID AT NEW DELHI 0
NANDAN SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sunil Malhotra, Advocate
UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. l.S. Kohli, proxy counsel for Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate for DOL
Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for R-2.
>
-1.
+ W.P.(C) 12560/2009 & CM APPL No. 13105/2009, 15401/09
RAMA DEEPAK ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sunil Malhotra, Advocate
Through : Mr. l.S. Kohli, proxy counsel for Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate for DOL
Mr. Rajiv Sharma, Advocate for R-2.
ORDER
1. Mr. Rajiv Sharma, learned counsel for the Respondent No.2 states that pursuant to the order dated 22nd October 2009 a fresh show cause notice has 2010:DHC:10317 •e been issued to the Petitioners and they have also submitted thjePlY, He further states that the Respondent No.2 will, after considering the reply, pass a speaking order within four weeks and a copy of the said order will be communicated to the Petitioners within one week thereafter.
2. In view of the aforesaid...statement and for the reasons stated in the order dated 22nd July 2009 passed in Rama Pandey v. Union of India & Anr • [w.P. (Civil) 8558 of 2009J, the impugned order dated 15th April 2009 is hereby quashed. It will be open to the Petitioners, if they are still aggrieved thereafter, to seek appropriate remedies that are available to them in law.
3. The petitions and the pending applications are disposed of.
4. Order be given dasti to learned counsel for the parties..[1] V MARCH 25, 2010 rk S.MURALIDHAR, J.