Shri Amba Prasad Aggarwal & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 16 Mar 2010 · 2010:DHC:1540-DB
Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Veena Birbal
WP (C) No.2286 of 2008
2010:DHC:1540-DB
other other Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court refused media access to the judgment and decided against reporting it, without addressing substantive issues.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 16.03.2010 WP (C) No.2286 of 2008
SHRI AMBA PRASAD AGGARWAL & ANR. …PETITIONERS
Through: Mr. Anand Yadav, Advocate.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS
Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Advocate for the LAC.
Mr. Rajiv Bansal & Mr. Harshit Agarwal, Advocates for the DDA.
Ms. Sudershani Ray, Advocate for the MCD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
JUDGMENT

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No

2. To be referred to Reporter or not? No

3. Whether the judgment should be No reported in the Digest?

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. (Oral) For Orders, see WP(C) Nos.12974-75/2006.

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. MARCH 16, 2010 VEENA BIRBAL, J. b'nesh