Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 16.03.2010 WP (C) No.7754 of 2007
SHRI AJEET PRASAD AGGARWAL …PETITIONER
Through: Mr. Anand Yadav, Advocate.
Date of Decision: 16.03.2010 WP (C) No.7754 of 2007
SHRI AJEET PRASAD AGGARWAL …PETITIONER
Through: Mr. Anand Yadav, Advocate.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS
Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Advocate for the LAC.
Mr. Rajiv Bansal & Mr. Harshit Agarwal, Advocates for the DDA.
Ms. Sudershani Ray, Advocate for the MCD.
Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Advocate for the LAC.
Mr. Rajiv Bansal & Mr. Harshit Agarwal, Advocates for the DDA.
Ms. Sudershani Ray, Advocate for the MCD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
JUDGMENT
1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No
2. To be referred to Reporter or not? No
3. Whether the judgment should be No reported in the Digest?
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. (Oral) For Orders, see WP(C) Nos.12974-75/2006.
SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. MARCH 16, 2010 VEENA BIRBAL, J. b'nesh