a3b10786a317513012c19b75f5be3d25d805d7dd99eff4544a41208fbaf5ca63

Delhi High Court · 26 Feb 2010 · 2010:DHC:14901
Indermeet Kaur
CS(OS) No.1691/2009
2010:DHC:14901
civil appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The court decreed the civil suit based on a compromise, granting a permanent injunction against the defendants' use of pirated software and disposing of all pending applications.

Full Text
Translation output
% 26.02.2010
Present: Ms.Safia Said, Advocate for the plaintiffs.
Mr.Sunil Kumar Rai, Advocate for the defendants. r!()
+ I.A.No.2378/2010 & CS(OS) No.1691/2009 & 1.A.No.11694/2009 ( u/O 39 Rule 1&2
CPC)
This is a joint application filed by the parties under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC. It is stated that the parties have resolved the disputes in terms of compromise. The application is supported by the affidavit of the constituted attorney of the plaintiffs as also defendant no. Iwho is the director of defendant no.2. Terms of compromise are contained in the aforestated application. The parties are bound by the terms contained therein. In terms of the aforestated compromise, the suit of the plaintiffs is decreed.
The defendants, their principal officers, directors, agents etc. are restrained by permanent injunction from using directly or indirectly storing, installing, reproducing pirated unlicenced software's of the plaintiffs. The pending application is also disposed of. No orders as to cost. Decree sheet be drawn.
File be consigned to record room.
FEBRUARY 26, 2010.
'nandan'
INDERMEET KAUR, J.
2010:DHC:14901
JUDGMENT