Beena Rani v. State

Delhi High Court · 23 Mar 2010 · 2010:DHC:7322
S.L. Bhayana
CRL.M.C. 3028/2008
2010:DHC:7322
criminal appeal_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 380 and 420 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings served no useful purpose.

Full Text
Translation output
.-- HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CRL.M.C. 3028/2008
0/o BEENA RANI ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Adv.
VERSUS
STATE & ANR. .. ... Respondents
CORAM:
Through Mr. O.P. Saxena, Adv. for the State.
Mr. A.K. Mishra with Mr. M.K. Upadhaya, Adv. for R-2.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.L.BHAYANA
23.03.2010 It is submitted by learned counsel for both the parties that the matter has been settled between the parties in terms of Settlement
Agreement dated 02.2.2010. Settlement Agreement is exhibited 'PX' and the same is placed on record.
Mr. Amit Gupta, Special Power of Attorney holder of respondent no.2, Jagdish Chand Gupta is present in Court and submits that in terms of Settlement Agreement (Ex. PX) the parties have arrived at a settlement and he has no objection if the FIR No. 590/2005 u/s
380/420 IPC registered at PS Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi is quashed.
Heard.
In my opinion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing with the said FIR, particularly when the parties have settled their
2010:DHC:7322 disputes amicably. In view of the above, the petition is allowed and 1
FIR No. 590/2005 u/s 380/420 IPC registered at PS Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi and all other proceedings arising thereof are ordered to be quashed against the accused/petitioner.
Both the parties are directed to remain bound by the terms and conditions as envisaged in the Settlement Agreement (Ex. PX).
The petition stands disposed of.
Dasti.
S.L.BHAYANA,J - f...,£).,~ fvJ,T'f,{}.No. lfB'i-7.-/JO -! Ql/oy~->~ o-1' R~ ~ ~ -rdea11.e t!>.p F~ll.s. .,Iff'·~
.;v-. Jie ~g~.
- t?d't~ ~~(»>~ of On .? '3/B/:?o/O.
- (}el~fbllf ~Y<terv,e,tf- eli ,_,;,_jf)()jo OY\ Yet~
2010:DHC:7322
JUDGMENT