Romilla Sawhney v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 26 Mar 2010 · 2010:DHC:1804-DB
Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Veena Birbal
WP (C) No.2143/2007
2010:DHC:1804-DB
other other

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court reserved and decided a writ petition filed by Mrs. Romilla Sawhney against various government respondents, but the provided text does not disclose substantive details or the final judgment.

Full Text
Translation output
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Reserved on : 26.02.2010
Date of Decision: 26.03.2010 WP (C) No.2143/2007
MRS.ROMILLA SAWHNEY … … …PETITIONER
Through : NEMO - V E R S U S -
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.… … … … … RESPONDENTS
Through : Mr.Ajay Verma, Ms.Renuka Arora and Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, Advocates for the DDA.
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Advocate for Land & Building Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and LG of Delhi.
Mr.Sanjay Poddar, Advocate for LAC.
Ms.Rachna Shrivastava, Advocate for Govt. of NCT of Delhi.
Mr.B.V.Niren, Mr.Atul Nanda, Ms.Rameeza Hakeem, Mr.Gaurav
Gupta, Mr.Sumeer Sodhi, Ms.Malika Gahlot, Ms.Sugandha and Mr.Sanjay
Bhardwaj, Advocates for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL
JUDGMENT

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No

2. To be referred to Reporter or not? No

3. Whether the judgment should be No reported in the Digest?

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.