Full Text
Translation output
$-30 HIGH COURT OF DELHI I.A.4265/2010IN CS(OS)2304/2009
AUTODESK,INC& ANR. . ■ a ^ t-.
Through:Mr.Ankush Mahajan,Advocate.
Plaintiffs
AUTODESK,INC& ANR. . ■ a ^ t-.
Through:Mr.Ankush Mahajan,Advocate.
Plaintiffs
VERSUS
MEHUL HANSOTl& ORS.
Through:Mr.Ashim Aggarwal and Mr.Chetan Gupta,Advocates.
Defendants
Through:Mr.Ashim Aggarwal and Mr.Chetan Gupta,Advocates.
Defendants
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT «/ /o
07.04.2010 I.A. No.4265/2010(0-23,R-3 CPC)
Thj-ough this application, the parties request the Court to record the compromise, terms of which are set out in paragraph 2(a)to 2(i)ofthe application. The application is supported by the affidavit ofthe piaintifFs constituted attorney as well as the affidavit ofthe representatives ofdefendant Nos.2-4.
Having considered the submissions and materials on record, the Court is of the opinion that interest ofjustice require that the application should be allowed.
I.A. No.4265/2010 is allowed.
CS fOSl 2304/2009 The plaintiffs submit that the first defendant may be deleted from the array of
2010:DHC:14912 \ parties. Ordered aeeordingly.
In view ofthe order made today in LA.No.4265/2010,CS(OS)2304/2009 has to be decreed in terms ofthe said application.
Learned counsel for the defendants has handed over a demand draft of
Rs.57,55,895.20(Rs. Fift>' Seven Lakh,Fifty Five Thousand,Eight Flundred Ninety Five and Paise Twenty only)in terms ofparagraph 2(b)ofLA.No.4265/2010.
Let a decree in terms of paragraph 2(a) to 2 (i) of the application be drawn subject to the plaintiffs depositing the deficient amount constituting difference between the amount ofthe Court fee paid and the aggregate ofamounts payable under paragraphs
2(b)& 2(c)ofthe application.
07.04.2010 I.A. No.4265/2010(0-23,R-3 CPC)
Thj-ough this application, the parties request the Court to record the compromise, terms of which are set out in paragraph 2(a)to 2(i)ofthe application. The application is supported by the affidavit ofthe piaintifFs constituted attorney as well as the affidavit ofthe representatives ofdefendant Nos.2-4.
Having considered the submissions and materials on record, the Court is of the opinion that interest ofjustice require that the application should be allowed.
I.A. No.4265/2010 is allowed.
CS fOSl 2304/2009 The plaintiffs submit that the first defendant may be deleted from the array of
2010:DHC:14912 \ parties. Ordered aeeordingly.
In view ofthe order made today in LA.No.4265/2010,CS(OS)2304/2009 has to be decreed in terms ofthe said application.
Learned counsel for the defendants has handed over a demand draft of
Rs.57,55,895.20(Rs. Fift>' Seven Lakh,Fifty Five Thousand,Eight Flundred Ninety Five and Paise Twenty only)in terms ofparagraph 2(b)ofLA.No.4265/2010.
Let a decree in terms of paragraph 2(a) to 2 (i) of the application be drawn subject to the plaintiffs depositing the deficient amount constituting difference between the amount ofthe Court fee paid and the aggregate ofamounts payable under paragraphs
2(b)& 2(c)ofthe application.
CS(OS)2304/2009 is decreed in the above terms.
S.RAVINDllA BHAT,J APRIL 07,2010 /vd/ 2010:DHC:14912
S.RAVINDllA BHAT,J APRIL 07,2010 /vd/ 2010:DHC:14912
JUDGMENT